Does any 1 know any university that teaches MBA in USA & doesnt requier to take the GMAT? I perfer it in CA.?

Answer 1

Although it is not an MBA program specifically, the University of Southern California (USC) has a "Communication Management" program which is designed to be the equivalent of an MBA. It is a management degree with a few different emphases to choose from. They do, however, require that you take the GRE and the TOEFL if you are an international student. Within USC, the program is located in the Annenberg School of Communication... a very prestigious school in that field.

If you are unfamiliar with the definition of communication management, here is a definition so you can see the similarities between this program and an MBA program:
This article has been tagged since May 2007.

"Communications management is the systematic planning, implementing, monitoring, and revision of all the channels of communication within an organization, and between organizations; it also includes the organization and dissemination of new communication directives connected with an organization, network, or communications technology. Aspects of communications management include developing corporate communication strategies, designing internal and external communications directives, and managing the flow of information, including online communication. New technology forces constant innovation on the part of communications managers."

Answer 2

I don't know if it is still true, but as of a few years ago Pepperdine University didn't require the GMAT - they had some analogies test you could take instead. Unfortunately, their website doesn't tell you much, and this may have changed since they got AACSB accreditation.

Answer 3

in accordance to the WTS, "the guy Jesus is ineffective, continually ineffective . . . " (study in the Scriptures, Vol. 5, 454). "We deny that he became raised in the flesh, and project any assertion to that result as being unscriptural" (study, Vol. 7, fifty seven). Jesus’ fleshly physique "became disposed of by means of Jehovah God, dissolved into its constitutive components or atoms" (The Watchtower, 9-a million-1953, 518). "as a manner to persuade Thomas of who he became, he used a physique with wound holes" (you could stay continually in Paradise on the earth, one hundred forty five). He became raised as an invisible spirit creature, without actual physique (Reasoning From the Scriptures, 214-215). although, in accordance to Scripture, "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is in ineffective, and you're nonetheless on your sins" (a million Cor. 15:17). Jesus makes sparkling, even earlier dying, that that's his physique which would be raised up. He supplies to boost up the temple as quickly as that's destroyed. "He became speaking concerning the temple of his physique" (John 2:21). After he had risen, he supplies the comparable testimony, "See my palms and my ft, that that's i actually; experience me and notice, simply by fact a spirit does not have flesh and bones only as you behold that I actual have. . . . Do you have something there to devour?" (Luke 24:39, forty-one). Jesus insists that Thomas place his finger into his wounded side, as a manner to tutor that he had certainly risen from the ineffective (John 20:27). there's no question that Jesus had particularly risen from the ineffective. No Christian became below the effect that he became invisibly raised as Michael the Archangel, whilst God the father dissolved his organic physique. one in all those presumption is without historic or scriptural warrant, and the "info is in the pudding": Ask the JW to tutor you a Scripture verse which backs up the WTS’s fact approximately God removing Jesus’ physique. He can’t, simply by fact there isn’t one.