That would be article number 3-7-0. Of what document is another question.
2007-08-05 20:15:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dull Jon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No law of India can be made applicable in Indian held part of Kashmir (46 % land of whole state) unless & until it is cleared by LEGAL Constituent Assembly (which never existed as all elections held were rigged , never scored more than 2% votes, according to press council of India & international observers, journalists & jurists' teams) of 'whole' state. The so called first contituent aseembly was made such that all nomination papers of all opposition parties of all 75 seats were deliberately declared invalid by the team of INDIAN election commission & so , all 75 candidates of one party favouring India were elected unopposed merely by nominations having no contest at all , having no such horrible eaxmple in history of any democratic election of the world. That assembly ratified article 370 & was abolished after that makinw so called art. 370 permanent. How confusing it is? It acts as a bridge between India & Disputed state Kashmir to give India authority on only three subjects as : Defence, Communication & Foreign affairs only & in other matters the state has legal autonomy till the UNSC plebiscite is held & India wins that. Only after that the state will ever become like any other state of India. Before that it will remain a disputed state between India & Pakistan b coz its accession is subject to approval of the people of the state as per UN Charter pending since 5-1-1949 b coz India first delayed and evaded that on flimsy grounds on fear of losing by ovewhelming Muslim majority of the state. It is said that on 27th Oct., 1947 at 9.00 am, king(not publicc rpresentative) signed the state's accession to India in Jammu, after fleeing by car in darkness of night , after his regime was overthrown by people of Kashmir, being far from capital of state , having no support at all. That too was having some conditions which were never fulfilled by India till now. If Art. 370 is abrogated , the sole bridge will break & so, the state will become an independent country as it was before 27 th Oct., 1947 .
2007-08-06 02:43:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
article 370 of the Indian constitution bestows special status to the state of J&K. among other things the writ of indian courts does not apply to them, what their court says goes. the legislature enacts its own laws and the boundries and names cannot be changed by the indian parliament. special provisions also exist for substantial aid and grants to be given to the state and no non-resident can invest in real estate in the state. in short it is a special state within the union by virtue of article 370!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
2007-08-05 20:47:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by sherkhaan09 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
bounderies between countries are the unreal cause of dispute. so called erstwhile kings /queens/nawabs and their present incarnations in the forms of ministers/bureaucrats never lived/shall ever live near the borders. at the same time they want ano mans/woman's land to distinguish their landed possessions. it is common evils which prompted them to insert a clause in the constitutions that no outsider of that very state /union territory would be allowed to buy landed properties and settle as indians. this way mr karan singh and his ilk will still be called THE Rajas of that place and enjoy royalties, they are so fond of.
2007-08-06 02:25:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
article 370 of indian constitution gives special right to jammu and kashmir.By removing this article jammu and kashmir will come in line of other states of India.No one can buy property in jammu and kashmir except those belong to these two places.
2007-08-06 23:26:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by suhana 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
its a Act for criminals
2007-08-05 20:16:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by gandhi kumar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋