Yes!!! He was a Hall of Famer with or without steroids. Steroids don't give you the all-time home run record, you need to be a great hitter on top of it. Because of his nasty defense and baserunning, things that steroids don't help you with, he is a hall of famer with or without steroids.
2007-08-05 14:09:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eric 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
YES!...... first of all im not a huge fan of neither baseball or Bonds, but the guy has played at a high level in his career, so he deserves his spot.
And im sick of hearing about him using steroids.... Even if he is taking them for ultra turbo power to make him the world's strongest man, guess what..... he STILL has to hit the damn ball!! You dont send a baseball flying out of the park if you dont hit it on the right place, at the right time and with the right motion of the bat!
2007-08-05 21:19:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by AlexR 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think it is a good argument. He shouldnt go because he took steroids and that is cheating. But at the same time he should because he will probably be #1 in hrs after this year. However, by the way A Rod is playing, he probably wont be the leader for long. I say no.
2007-08-05 21:23:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by carolinafan004 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Even though he most likely did take steroids, I think that he should. He's a great outfielder, and he was an amazing stealer back in the day. Home runs aren't everything.
2007-08-05 21:06:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by sum1 w/ @n @nsw3r 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
not at all. i believe that the baseball hall of fame is to be about players who have earned a place there with their true talent, not by cheating. to me, barry bonds dont got any tru talent.
2007-08-05 22:35:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by alinamaria. 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course ;755.
2007-08-06 01:55:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by SF Giants 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because he would be a bad role model for future generations of baseball players and fans alike. It doesn't matter that he tries to deny using it.
2007-08-05 21:14:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
He was a HOF before steroids, but if Pete Rose isn't it, Bonds shouldn't be in
2007-08-05 21:18:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
My prediction is that the writers will punish him for a few years at first but eventualy they will put him in.
2007-08-05 21:54:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Scooter_loves_his_dad 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes milestones broken.
2007-08-05 21:28:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Michael M 7
·
1⤊
0⤋