According to Brian Greene, The Fabric of the COSMOS (his CDs), if the whole universe could be reduced to the size of earth, the part of it that would be available to us for observation would be the size of a grain of rice; that the light produced by distant planets and galaxies have not yet had time to reach us, and won't until well after the earth and our solar system has long gone out of existence.
If that is so, then how can astronomers say that they have looked as far back as the first star systems at the edge of the universe?
2007-08-05
13:55:22
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Bob D1
7
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space
So far, I have seen some really good answers, but I just don't get it. At the singularity, just after the big-bang, inflationary theory says that "stuff" expanded out very, very rapidly filling what was then the flat universe. The universe cooled, matter formed, and the space fabric began to stretch; thus, spacetime. There is no center or point of origin to the universe. Then, if a galaxy formed, the tadpole galaxy, and it was so far away that its light hasn't had time to reach us. We would have no idea that the tadpole galaxy even exists. If we haven't seen the tadpole galaxy yet, what does looking back to 13.5 billion years into an area of space that we can see, really mean? Wouldn't that suggest that the tadpole galaxy is much further away and older than 13.5 billions years of light travel? Given "zero space," and the Calabi-yau manifold at the Planck length; and the singularity happened uniformly throughout the universe at once---what does it all mean! LOL
2007-08-05
16:21:45 ·
update #1