English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm kinda bored and feel like wasting time O.K so just answer it ok NO rude remarks please!!!

2007-08-05 13:09:35 · 6 answers · asked by victoria 1 in Society & Culture Mythology & Folklore

6 answers

First, one must calculate the strength of the woodchuck by comparing him with other specimens of his species. Is he male, female, how old? Is he in good physical condition? Has he eaten before undertaking the task? Has he experience with 'chucking'?

Then, one must calculate the dimensions and weight of the wood? What type of wood? Green or dead? Dry or saturated? Will he get splinters?

How much time does this creature have to complete the endeavor? Is it day, or night? Is it raining or dry? What's the wind speed? Is it cold out or hot? Is the wood provided for him or does he have to go and get it before he can begin 'chucking'?

Finally, one must calculate the distance for the wood to be 'chucked.' Does it have to travel past a certain point to qualify as being 'chucked'? Must it land in a collecting bin, or land in a certain position? Is he provided with a continuous stream of new material or must he re-use the same wood over and over again?

Once this equation is properly calibrated, you will then know the answer to this fascinating science question. Test on Friday. Bonus points awarded if you can think of another definition for 'chuck' as used in the context of this question.

PS: I am even more bored than you are ; )

2007-08-06 09:33:33 · answer #1 · answered by howldine 6 · 0 0

A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.

That is the correct answer, by the way.

2007-08-05 13:18:00 · answer #2 · answered by Tom K 6 · 1 0

Wood chucks chuck few bits of wood now-a-days as people hunt them with High Power rifles with scopes. They don't take them home to eat, they just kill them and brag.

2007-08-05 13:17:34 · answer #3 · answered by Terry 7 · 0 0

idk..heres another question for you:

fuzzy wuzzy was a bear
fuzzy wuzzy had no hair
fuzzy wuzzy wasnt fuzzy,
was he?

-i say that the answer is no, if he had no hair how could he be fuzzy?

2007-08-05 13:38:01 · answer #4 · answered by katiemarie:] 2 · 0 0

a whole chuck load. ;)

2007-08-05 18:57:03 · answer #5 · answered by laniechrysler 2 · 0 0

4.1 pounds.

2007-08-05 13:32:42 · answer #6 · answered by tynquerbelle 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers