I LOVE HILLARY.
2007-08-05 13:05:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Socialist"?, "Helathcare"? What are you talking about? A president should never be chosen based on their policies or other details. Do you honestly think you could figure out if someone could be a good president by their "universal healthcare", and other crap. Stop choosing based on petty details such as "socialist", what they believe in, healthcare, etc. We don't need some politician with experience (she doesn't have the experience to lead this country because she never has). What America needs is passion. The passion to lead this country again.
I can tell you this. If Hillary clinton becomes president of the United States of America, this country is screwed.
2007-08-06 16:27:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't like Hillary because I think she's incompetent for the job, and that has nothing to do with her being a woman. You are right, she is too liberal. I think all those things you mentioned are wrong, except legalizing some immigrants, and I want the best for the country and the world. Gay marriage and abortion to MY point of view are nowhere near being what's best for the country and the world. It's actually all the opposite. Each day our morals keep going further down.
2007-08-05 15:23:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Siervocal 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary belongs in the history books, not as a president but as one of the blindest first ladies ever. She tolerated Bill's exploits and denied them all the way. Her denial of reality demonstrated her inability to command anything greater than the family checkbook. It is a shame someone with her brain has degraded herself by sticking with the bum.
2007-08-05 12:09:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by old codger 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton is the worst secretary of State in US history, the earliest woman in the white house, the stupid wife in the family ( no wonder Bill roam elsewhere ), and yet she is a blank.... ing...welfare pp.
Walmart or 7/11 might consider her as a stupid cashier job.
get real stupid B
Nolan.Dang
2015-07-31 04:24:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Thang 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't hate anyone but I certainly don't think she is a smart choice for President. I think she would continue to condone & make way for the moral decay that is destroying our society today. I would love to see a woman take that role but not her. I'm a Christian & many of her views & policies are in direct contradiction to God's word & His law for us. It was only when we actually acknowledged & followed His laws that our country prospered. I don't consider myself a hard-core member of any political party but as a hard-core Christian I have to go with which candiate is most Christ-like. Jesus Christ would most certainly love, help & accept undocumented immigrants (Leviticus 19:34 "The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.") He would absolutely NOT support gay marriage (Leviticus 20:13 'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.") or murder by abortion (Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart;)" It has nothing to do with being in the "dark ages" but everything to do with our moral compass no longer working. We used to have laws against sodomy. Now we have not only changed those laws but made new laws allowing same sex marriage. God is the same yesterday, today & forever. If it was wrong back then, it's still wrong today regardless of how politically correct it may be at the time. God doesn't jump on the latest bandwagon. He is God. He is infallible & when we refuse to see that & acknowledge it is when we find ourselves in the sad, sick state we find our country in today.
2007-08-05 16:39:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pamela 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
with Hillary in office, it would be like Bill is running it again. also, because she was once first lady, she has alot of skeletons in the closet that she is always getting asked about. which keeps her from going forward. and finally, she is a women. thats not a bad thing unless your a leader of a country. many middle eastern countries view women as 2nd to them. which means at meetings with these countries, whe won't be taken seriously. its unfortunate, but its the way it is.
2007-08-05 11:59:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Razgriz01 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hilldebeast is a self serving, egotistic, manical, back stabbing, two faced , Socialist,lesbian. Enough said?
2007-08-05 13:58:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate her.
She is a socialist.... it is not just healthcare... its taxes and everything else. Its all about "Lets all work together, and screw the individual".
She has stolen MILLIONS of dollars from old people. Her involvement with Whitewater should put her in jail for the rest of her life.
2007-08-05 11:58:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mike 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
>>>>>>Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos Does Not Disclose Hillary Clinton Conflict Of Interest In WP/ABC Iowa Poll That Ranked Ron Paul Second To Last
______________________________
From Washington Post:
______________________________
Washington Post-ABC News Poll-The Washington Post-Sunday, August 5, 2007
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp...ml? hpid=topnews
This Washington Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone July 26-31, 2007, among a random sample of 402 Iowans likely to vote in the Republican caucus. The results have an five percentage point margin of sampling error. Sampling, data collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, Pa. and J. Ann Selzer of Selzer & Company, Inc. of Des Moines, Iowa consulted on this project.
______________________________
Selzer and Company Lists Wal-Mart as one of their top customers and promotes that they use "art" as well as facts when creating polls.
______________________________
J. Ann Selzer of Selzer & Company, Inc.
http://www.selzerco.com/
Naturally, quality public opinion research is scientific. It is precisely measured, accurately tabulated, and meticulously reported. That's where many research companies stop. They ask the questions and give their clients the numbers. Period. That's not enough. You need insights and ideas you can use. That's where the art comes in.
Clients Include: Wal-Mart, Grace A. Dow Memorial Library of Michigan, American Press Institute.
______________________________
Hillary Clinton Served On Wal-Mart Board Of Directors For 6 Years.
______________________________
Hillary Rodham Clinton served on the Board of Directors at Wal-Mart for a Six-year tenure
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/2...f3a9c40& ei=5070
______________________________
Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos Never Disclosed This Relationship And Obvious Conflict Of Interest.
This shows that not only is Hillary Clinton have the capability to be connected to companies that can manipulate elections on various levels, she audaciously does not disclose these connections. Reminds me of Bush, Arbusto, and Bin Laden.
______________________________
Because of Ron Paul's consistent stand on the Iraq war [the largest issue facing Americans], he has been seen as the only GOP candidate that can beat front runner Hillary Clinton.
______________________________
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ arti...07candefeat.htm
http://www.gambling911.com/Onlin...aul- 052207.html
http://www.godlikeproductions.co...=8/3/07& forum=1
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/a.../25/ 289229.aspx
http://www.buchanan.org/blog/?p=787
http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au...ent/2007/06/12/
http://groups.google.com/group/a...1fe3f1? lnk=raot
______________________________
This answers any question of motif as to why Hillary would hide conflicts of interest between her and the Washington Post/ABC Iowa Poll that was used to:
1]Present an image of who is in the upper and lower tier of GOP Presidential Candidates so that more attention by the audience is given to those at the supposed upper tier.
2]Somehow justify Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos [another obvious conflict of interest-but a disclosed one] only allowing a total of 2 minutes to Dr. Ron Paul in a 90 minute debate. He even revealed to all the viewers that he controlled the "green light" which timed candidates responses.
______________________________
These obviously powerful and compelling methods of creating artificial barriers in the election process should be disclosed to the American people so that our entire presidential election process is not compromised further than we have seen in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006. To see clearly whether or not we are living under a totalitarian dictatorship, this might be the first place to investigate
2007-08-06 05:22:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by informed 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dislike her because she isnt liberal enough and im a socailist who only votes for democrats. she voted for the iraq war but recently in a debate called it 'bush's war' and she also refuses to admit her vote for the iraq war was wrong. she also sold out on universal health care and now is receiving huge political funds from health care companys. also she tried to make it in the constitution that you couldnt burn the american flag. also she wants to make it illegal for minors to play M rated video games, which is absurd, and probly will just cause us to bootleg em. i do think the republicans hate her so much in part because shes a women though, because shes one of the more conservative of the democrat candidates. im going for obama
2007-08-05 11:59:45
·
answer #11
·
answered by Will M 2
·
1⤊
3⤋