English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

28 answers

Hell, to the no! I didn't vote for him the first time (well, no one did), or the second time. And since I haven't had a lobotomy, I wouldn't vote for him a third time either.

2007-08-13 07:53:27 · answer #1 · answered by ameerah m 5 · 0 0

I have agreed with President Bush on a lot of issues in the past, however, recently I wouldn't say that. I voted for him. But I think the country needs someone with a new view on things. So, no, I would not vote him in for a third term.

2007-08-13 11:27:46 · answer #2 · answered by blank 2 · 0 0

end being so ****** up, human beings. Being suggested starts off off by using using asking questions. besides, like many others have suggested, Bush, the father replaced into president and then it replaced into his son. the version in names is George Walker Bush for the father and George Herbert Walker Bush for the son. The twenty 2nd replace which limits a president's words replaced into put in place after Franklin Delano Roosevelt (to no longer be puzzled with Theodore Roosevelt which replaced into his distant cousin and uncle of Franklin's companion) served 4 words.

2016-12-11 11:08:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

War and economics are what will judge Mr Bush. He is not the most eloquent speaker, but I believe he speaks from the heart. I know there is a lot of debate over his war policy, but it all depends on who you talk to when receiving perspective on the war in Iraq. I like Bush, but I don't believe I would elect him for a third term.

2007-08-13 04:54:13 · answer #4 · answered by rmmthe10 3 · 0 1

absolutely not!

He's been there 5 years too long IMHO.

Thank God for the amendment that limits presidents to two terms!

2007-08-13 11:12:45 · answer #5 · answered by stef_leppard 3 · 0 0

if there was a third term, i would try to get bill (42) to come back

2007-08-13 10:33:07 · answer #6 · answered by Constipated CON. 7 · 0 0

No. We have a wretched foreign policy which has been sorry for decades, & he's only making things worse.

2007-08-13 07:08:06 · answer #7 · answered by Cam1051Sec 5 · 0 0

No it's time to get someone with a different perspective in office.

2007-08-12 17:32:28 · answer #8 · answered by Slacker 5 · 0 1

Yes, if he was up against the current candidates we have seen so far. At least I know what to expect from GWB.

2007-08-05 11:30:21 · answer #9 · answered by higherlovetx 5 · 4 2

Sh*t no. I was not even one of those stupid enough to elect him in the first place.

2007-08-13 11:01:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers