2007-08-05 10:35:24 · 10 answers · asked by Guinness 5 in Pets ➔ Other - Pets
Well, of the vertebrates, without having any other details, I would say that person was horribly, horribly, horribly cruel.
I'm not as fond of fire ants, cockroaches, mosquitoes, and flies... so where drowning those are concerned... I say, go for it.
2007-08-05 10:40:28 · answer #1 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
someone with priorities.
but I limit this to cats and rodents....dogs and other mammals are not included in my answer. I see NOTHING wrong with drowning a bag of rats.
2007-08-05 12:01:00 · answer #2 · answered by Mitch 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Psychopath
2007-08-05 11:39:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
well i would say they arent animal luvers and i wouldnt trust them with a pet if u need to have someone watch ur pet dont let that person doo it 4 u cuz who knowes what will happen
2007-08-05 11:01:04 · answer #4 · answered by sportaries2 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would call them guilty of criminal animal abuse, and I would report them to the police and to the humane society.
Many people who abuse, torture and kill people, especially children, started out abusing, torturing and killing helpless animals.
2007-08-05 10:58:04 · answer #5 · answered by margecutter 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would call them troubled and immature and possibly criminal.
2007-08-05 10:43:24 · answer #6 · answered by marie j 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd say they were sick in the head
2007-08-05 11:16:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hmm..subspecies come to mind.......among others
2007-08-05 10:43:18 · answer #8 · answered by SageHallo 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
daddy
2007-08-05 10:53:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
psycho...why?
2007-08-05 12:30:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋