Well, of the vertebrates, without having any other details, I would say that person was horribly, horribly, horribly cruel.
I'm not as fond of fire ants, cockroaches, mosquitoes, and flies... so where drowning those are concerned... I say, go for it.
2007-08-05 10:40:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by scruffycat 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
someone with priorities.
but I limit this to cats and rodents....dogs and other mammals are not included in my answer. I see NOTHING wrong with drowning a bag of rats.
2007-08-05 12:01:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mitch 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Psychopath
2007-08-05 11:39:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
well i would say they arent animal luvers and i wouldnt trust them with a pet if u need to have someone watch ur pet dont let that person doo it 4 u cuz who knowes what will happen
2007-08-05 11:01:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by sportaries2 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would call them guilty of criminal animal abuse, and I would report them to the police and to the humane society.
Many people who abuse, torture and kill people, especially children, started out abusing, torturing and killing helpless animals.
2007-08-05 10:58:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by margecutter 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would call them troubled and immature and possibly criminal.
2007-08-05 10:43:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by marie j 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'd say they were sick in the head
2007-08-05 11:16:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hmm..subspecies come to mind.......among others
2007-08-05 10:43:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by SageHallo 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
daddy
2007-08-05 10:53:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
psycho...why?
2007-08-05 12:30:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋