English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

none. I don't need a preacher, I need a good president.

2007-08-05 08:17:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

What can you do about it in a democracy? People have the right to vote for whoever and whatever they want, and can consider religion or any other factor they want. They can take a religious philosophy into account as well as an economic or social philosophy, and the right to a private ballot and the freedom of speech protects their right to do so regardless of how many times people say "you can't legislate morality" and that sort of thing.

If someone thinks a certain candidate or law will anger an omnipotent being who can destroy the country, you can't expect them to support that candidate or law any more than you can expect someone to support a candidate or law if they think it will cause economic harm to the country.

I'm not saying I like it that we still discriminate against gays, for example. I don't like it, but the risk of that happening is part of the price of democracy, and we have to stop it via the democratic process rather than falsely proclaim that religion and politics can't be mixed.

2007-08-05 08:36:53 · answer #2 · answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5 · 0 3

i do no longer think of it somewhat is became extra Christian, however the fundamentalists i think are transforming into to be extra vocal. i think of faith gets interior the way right here. the situation of stem cellular analyze, case in point, replaced into thoroughly overtaken by ability of questions of no remember if it replaced into ethical in accordance to Christianity as adversarial to in basic terms debating the ethics w/o dragging god in. the final public of the inhabitants believes in god, and that i think of it is going to proceed to be that way for a protracted time, i'm sorry to declare. Edit: the human beings who're saying atheism is transforming into indexed under are flat out mendacity. there is not any data to assist that. the two maximum good polling businesses right here, have shown atheists are an extremely small minority, and the ratio of atheists to theists has remained just about the comparable over the final 5 years. I unquestionably have hardship looking figures that pass 30 years back, yet seeing as how atheists at the instant make up around 3-8% it somewhat is tricky to ascertain how we've grown so dramatically.

2016-10-01 11:14:15 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

As long as people and not machines run the government, there will be religion in politics. Even people who claim they don't have a religion... that is their religion. Religion is what you believe in and politics is full of blind faith believers even if it has nothing to do with gods.

2007-08-05 08:47:56 · answer #4 · answered by TJ815 4 · 1 0

None. If a church wants into politics, then give up the tax exemption they enjoy. As James Madison, the 4th President and a founding father of the Constitution wrote, "Religion and Government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together." Churches, keep your frickin' hands off my Country!

2007-08-05 08:25:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

What role SHOULD it play? Very little. But you would have to be blind, deaf, and half-retarded to claim that it doesn't have an effect. Why else would we have only elected one non-Protestant in the history of the Presidency? (and even he was a Catholic, which is basically the same thing). The bottom line is that 90-95% of people in this country believe in some kind of God, and people are always far more likely to vote for someone who shares their beliefs.

2007-08-05 08:22:50 · answer #6 · answered by Dekardkain 3 · 3 2

Religion should have no role in politics. When it does that is when you get people trying to control what others do.

2007-08-05 08:21:37 · answer #7 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 3 1

Religion should not play any part in politics or elections.

2007-08-05 08:19:37 · answer #8 · answered by Questionable 3 · 4 1

Churches should offer their endorsements and campaigning to the candidate who promises them 1) the most money from our taxes and 2) the most control over other peoples lives. No, not really, just kidding. Religion should stay the f out of politics.

2007-08-05 08:30:21 · answer #9 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1 2

A large role. As EVERYTHING you believe in is a religion regardless if you cal it that or not.

Belief in evolution of man from apes is a religion as well. So they call it a theory instead. Atheism is its own religion of disbelief.

Beliefs are a part of who the candidates are and what they base their decisions on.

2007-08-05 08:18:19 · answer #10 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2 2

People should choose candidates based on whether those candidates share their same beliefs and goals.

Whether those beliefs are religious-based or not doesn't really matter. It's a matter of whether the candidate or the elected official is one you like and support.

BUT, religion should never be used as a justification to enact laws or political policy -- not in the US.

2007-08-05 08:20:36 · answer #11 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers