Why do people think America starts wars to steal oil?Could it be because it's part of the truth?

Question

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=332835&contrassID=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listScr=Y]Haaretz
The United States has asked Israel to check the possibility of pumping oil from Iraq to the oil refineries in Haifa. The request came in a telegram last week from a senior Pentagon official to a top Foreign Ministry official in Jerusalem.
Will this make the US even more popular in the Muslim world and once and for all debunk the rumour America is in it with Israel?Is this another great diplomatic move by the Bush white house?

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=332835&contrassID=2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listScr=Y]Haaretz

Answer 1

People think that because it is true. People deny it because they are not intelligent enough to see the connection between the war in Iraq and controlling their oil fields and the same of oil in the near future. They make the same tired argument of oh if we are stealing the oil why is gas $3 a gallon. That is not even relevant in any way.
The US asking Israel to help pump oil from Iraq to Israel will be disastrous. That is what they want though. With more "terrorist" attacks they can justify a longer occupation of Iraq. We are not leaving anytime soon and they do anything to make sure that happens. Including bungling a war which should have been easily won. The Bush White House is doing everything is can to further the neo conserative movement.

Answer 2

Is this a serious Question?? Furthermore ,why is this stated as a question instead of what it is, A FACT.

Perhaps it all started when after WW1 the US led the way in carving up thec Middle East to apportion oil reserves among the victories and gerrymandering borders into countries with absolutely no friggin concern for the peoples in the Middle East or theirv culture and tribal connections.

Perhaps is was because in 1953 the terrorist state ,the US conspired with Britain to destroy the DEMOCRATIC government of Iran because the government had this weird idea that it's natural resourses belonged to Iranians and that they could do with THEIR natural resourses (OIL) whatever THEY decided to do with them just like the US.

As the US as usual believes they have a manifest destiny right to everything in the world ,disagreed and ousted the democratic government and replaced it with their friend and puppet,the murdering vile right wing dictator,the Shah of Iran.

With their viscious Shah and his infamously vile secret police ,the Savaak,the SHAH was able for at least 26 years to butcher and terrorize his citizens into submission anytime some fool talked of democracy,freedom and liberty like they once had before the bloody American atrocity. So for 26 years,the US gas guzzlers had a stable and relatively cheap oil supply on the backs and graves of thousands of Iranian.

But never mind,it was the US military that coined the vile phrase COLATERAL DAMAGE to describe innocent HUMAN BEINGS that are killed in conflicts.Of course and as usual the monumental hypocritical Americans wouls carpet bomb any country who dared refer to the innocent victims of their conflicts like 9/11 as COLATERAL DAMAGE.



And you wonder why the Iranians hate Americans as I would hate Americans if they pulled their crap on my country.

Perhaps it is because ,the US ,like in Iran until 1979,fully supports militarily ,economically and politically a string of filthy right wing dictatorship who likec the SHAH use all this US support to keep their citizens in line so that the good littlev American Christiansc have erelatively cheap gaz
for their huge gas guzzling SUVs.

One day like with Iran,Saudi Arabia and Egypt and other US supported dictatorships will simply IMPLODE and out of it we will see a wave of anger and hatred for the US for all it's atrocities over the years .

While I even support Israel's right to exist, there is a big difference between supporting an ally and thecUS-Israeli relationship is simply incestuous and much of the US problem in the area is because of this horridly too close relationship which effectively sees Israel as the 51 st state with all the literally billions it recieves from the US every year.

I have no doubt whatsoever that the news of this proposed deal will continue to soar the membership in al qaida.

Given the current situation and the intence hatred of the US,for the US to go ahead with an obscenity like this is just more confirmation of the utter contempt the US has for the peoples of the Middle East .

Answer 3

did u no that every member of the bush cabinet is a member of 1 of 3 secret societys either the skull and bones group the bilderburge groupe or the trilatiral commishion theree wus one man who wus a member of none but he wus quickly voted out. all the money going to the iraq war is bieing poketet by these groups did u no that every year some of the most power full richest peple in the world meet at the bildiberg hotel but it is never coverd in the news cuz thay control the news stations do some research if ur interested in the subject

Answer 4

The rulers could particularly sacrifice the country on the altar of "unfastened commerce" particularly than be categorized a "protectionist" simply by fact the Trickle downers made that component era derogatory. China practices heavy protectionism and that they are thriving. We practice financial suicide of so talked approximately as "unfastened commerce" and are dropping our shirts. inspite of the actuality of having a great component of our financial device outsourced there are nonetheless organization believers in "unfastened commerce" that make American coverage and the media to brainwash you that dropping your interest to China is a good concern simply by fact we've inexpensive crap at Walmart. What sturdy are inexpensive products without jobs? No baby-kisser will ever ask this question out of worry of being categorized protectionist. The fall down of the Soviet Union became the worst concern to happen to united statesa.. a minimum of then, capitalism became put in verify and united statesa. thrived. lower back then "protectionism" became considered "combating communism" so the cons approved of it. human beings like ken are the priority. He may be the single used as this "inexpensive hard artwork". do away with him from his comforts of Suburban united statesa. and deliver him and his relatives to a pair sweatshop distant places. I assure he won't like it one bit. he's only yet another racist white guy with an entitlement mentality to inexpensive hard artwork.

Answer 5

in the past, Britain had stolen oil in different parts of the world, especially the middle east. Remember what Lord Cruzon said " Fırat is border of the United Kingdom" and also Remember Anglo-sakson British company in Iran...etc. after the WWII , the US has entered international politics which was decided by Roosevelt and Britain had to give up its colonies. Because, WWII was too bloody and Britain was too tired to carry international politics. then, you know the world became two polar which was struggle between Capitalism and Communism, was called "the cold war". therefore, the US became hegemony over all oil sourses. that's all my friend, life is selfish

Answer 6

We'd pump in Alaska, but the war against polar bears isnt going to well. Besides, I'd rather be in bed with Israel than some country that would blow us up.
p.s. Proud Hispanic-Italian, hate America huh? Then get the f**k out of my country!

Answer 7

America does no such thing, the US maybe but not America. America is a continent with 37 nations the US is only ONE of those nations NOT the same thing.

Answer 8

Bush pumping oil to Israel from a country we invaded. Wow, is his goal to get EVERY muslim to hate us?? 2008 can't come soon enough.....

Answer 9

the kooks are putting in overtime.

if we were stealing oil, why isn't gas at .20 a gallon?

maybe, just maybe, if this is correct, they could be doing it so they could ease the SEVERE fuel shortage in iraq?

not crude oil knuckleheads, refined products.

Answer 10

That would create a very vulnerable oil pipeline, subject to multiple attacks. It doesn't sound like a good idea.