English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would like to nominate whoever announced the Cubs-Mets game as the absolute worst announcers to ever grace baseball. Not only did they not add anything to the game, their comments were actually unintelligent. They are just proof that you don't have to know anything about baseball to be a baseball announcer. These guys actually made Joe Carter sound like a decent announcer.

2007-08-05 03:17:26 · 12 answers · asked by dob367 3 in Sports Baseball

avataz_99 Joe Carter used to be an announcer for the Cubs. You are the one who is unintelligent you dickless wonder.

2007-08-05 04:22:04 · update #1

12 answers

Ugh, Tim McCarver and that other guy are the worst!

I mean, if people like him can get broadcasting jobs, I'm sure I can (my future seems a whole lot brighter now).

2007-08-05 04:41:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

have you never watched Fox Sports before?

This unfortunantly is par for the course with their baseball announcers.

I don't know why Boston fans are complaining next to the Yankees the Red Sox get more coverage than any of the small market teams. These people act like they have a school girl crush on the Yankees most of the time.

2007-08-05 05:27:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I think all FOX Sports announcers are Biased against all New England teams.The Red Sox are going to win it all again this year,and thaPatriots will follow suit.The only question is will N.E. Pats lose a game at all.But niether team can get respect from all national announcers.No problem though,we in New England love being the underdogs.

2007-08-05 03:39:03 · answer #3 · answered by The Beantown Legend 33 2 · 2 2

properly, the commentators have been given the technologies to work out issues extra suitable than the umpires yet i do no longer think of they criticize them too lots. If an umpire makes a undesirable call, it is critical for an announcer to choose for no be counted if or no longer if the call became suitable.

2016-10-09 06:25:37 · answer #4 · answered by eidemiller 4 · 0 0

Joe Carter or Joe Morgan? You are the one who is unintelligent

2007-08-05 03:23:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Still, Buck is better than say Bill O'Reilly. So I would rather have them. But Joe Carter - it got no worse than him. Him and Chip were like fire and smoke. Nothing you would want to see and smell.

2007-08-05 05:19:40 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 2 2

"Not only did they not add anything to the game, their comments were actually unintelligent."

Fox Sprots takes notes from Fox News(-based Opinions).

Seriously; replace "game" with "debate" or "discussion" or "story". It's spot-on.

2007-08-05 03:50:57 · answer #7 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 2 2

THOSE TWO CLOWNS ARE JOE BUCK & TIM McCARVER.THEY ARE AWFUL BUT ESPN'S JOE MORGAN IS THE WORST ANNOUNCER EVER.

2007-08-05 05:34:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I could not agree more. The would just ramble and ramble and ramble... almost everything they said was either a filler, or completley untrue.

2007-08-05 03:21:17 · answer #9 · answered by sprelletz 2 · 2 0

That is typical of Fox.

2007-08-05 07:30:21 · answer #10 · answered by chaba 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers