I see no fair and Balance where is the other side in their talks.
They act unclivilized with their guest if they are not Republicans. I see why Democrats don't want to go on their channel its a republican out let. Why is that Channel 99.9 percent white.
2007-08-05 02:55:24 · 20 answers · asked by margie s 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Not only is the whole channel white, but they have no hispanics, Asians nor indians your whole party is the same way.
2007-08-05 03:08:20 · update #1
by the way I'm Independent but I'm lending toward Democrats the seem to represent the counties racial mix.
2007-08-05 03:16:55 · update #2
It's always the "liberal" media.
From what I have seen, Fox seems like the Cheney Channel, To Neocons, any news that doesn't pander to the policies of the bush admin while suppressing any that call into question the success or wisdom of those policies, is labeled "liberal" a term that they have made pejorative and twisted beyond the true historical definition of the term.
2007-08-05 06:03:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
As for fair and balance.
There's no mass media that currently do that.
But at least with Fox News Channel, you know that they stop the spin at the right and make sure no one dare to spin it to the left. This enable you to know on where their stand, unlike other news channels, where you don't know on where they stand.
However currently though, Fox seeming to be kinda want to be lefty also, with shows like the Half Hour News and Red Eye.
As for acting uncivilized with their guests.
Well, Fox probably is kinder to their guests than some other news channels.
But nevertheless, here are some people you don't want to be guests on their shows.
- Hannity
- Guilfoyle
- Rivera
O'Reilly actually is pretty civilized despite his reputation as a Republican big meanie, however he definetly have rules on how you should act on his show.
As for hispanic, asian, and indians.
A few of the notorious ones are.
Geraldo and Orlando Salinas are hispanic, while Michelle who regulary subtitute for O'Reilly is Chinese.
Lets not forget (or should we?) that Lauren Green is black.
Kelly Wright is also black, basically a black Brian Kilmeade.
As for Democrats.
The problem is that the Democrats have no channel on their own.
2007-08-05 05:14:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
CNN and MSNBC really show no political bias, if they do it's ever so slightly to the left. They also have their fair share of right-wing hosts who have their own shows. FOX doesn't have any shows with a left-wing host. Alan Colmes is essentially a sidekick to Hannity, and Colmes himself is a moderate. John Gibson is french-hating racist, as is O'Reilly, Cavuto, etc.
FOX isn't right-wing, they are FAR right-wing, much further to the right than CNN could ever be to the left. It's very comical how they call themselves "Fair and Balanced" when they are the most slanted and tilted "news" channel.
I remember during the Mark Foley scandal they listed him as a Democrat (D-FL) on TV! And during their republican debate they listed each candidate's religion. Could anyone tell me how that has any relevance when determining the quality of a candidate?
Shame on Fox.
2007-08-05 03:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by trumph 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I guess I'm going to have to sit and watch a full day of Fox news sometime just to see what is so horrible. To date I've only ever seen a few minutes of it here and there and it's always been just news.
2007-08-05 03:33:49 · answer #4 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The fox group attracts a crowd who need people to do their thinking and air opinions they are too inarticulate to voice.
I guess it serves a purpose by simplifying events so even the dimmest have at least some cursory idea of current affairs.
2007-08-05 03:05:53 · answer #5 · answered by fredrick z 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
yes.
there should be some acknowledgement of the slant towards the administrations policies and the republican party in general.
i also think it would be worth while to do a study of money moving between the republican party and fox news.
i don't think american taxpayer dollars should be used to support what amounts to propaganda.
but i'd love to hear a radical republican explain to me why none of the bad news of the bush administration is ever news on fox news.
2007-08-05 03:00:12 · answer #6 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No
your wrong
I don't know their names but there have a racial mix
Micheal Malikin William Glower ???
and between Pelosia and Kennedy the devil is sweet mouthed.
and they are traitors in MY opinion. 12 % approval Ha Ha
and it makes no difference because your mind is made up and closed.
2007-08-05 03:14:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Actually it is the RNC channel on Fox.
2007-08-05 03:44:13 · answer #8 · answered by Follow the money 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
watch msnbc..Chris Matthews and Keith Oblerman never allow conservatives to speak
2007-08-05 05:24:27 · answer #9 · answered by John 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction.
Fox would not exist if was not for the liberal UNFAIR AND UNBALANCED networks and newspapers.
Is it not true that you libs just can't handle being labled for what you really are?
2007-08-05 03:13:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋