Excellent sense of humor! Thank you for starting my day wiht a laugh.
I think if O'Reilly ran, he'd use the "Fox-police" to count the votes and make a law that all his female employees showered with him so he could loofa their backs.
O'reilly is such a weasel, he'd be a perfect replacement for Bush, we would see no change at all.
Billo's personal code of ethics would make Bill Clinton look like Mother Theresa.
Thanks again for the humor.
(Sometimes these political questions get too serious).
2007-08-05 02:59:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leadfoot_Willie2.0 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bill O'Reilly will NEVER call the White House his House. After Bill Clinton anybody who uses the word Dominatrix on camera couldn't do it. Do you know how many times the Dems would play that clip if he ran
2007-08-05 12:28:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Allen Carlson 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bill O'Reilly would not be a good debater because he doesnt know when to shut up and let someone else speak. In a real debate, one has only a minute or so to make his case then allow their opponent time for rebuttal.
O'Reilly doesnt allow anyone who disagrees with him to get a word in edgewise.
2007-08-05 09:15:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bill O'Reilly is not being considered by most Americans to be a candidate to give way to the favored candidates.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-08-05 09:08:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I would not vote for Bill O'Reilly even if the only alternative was a nine year old boy.
2007-08-05 16:31:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Steven H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It takes more than having good writers and being able to read a cue card to become president; although Reagan was able to get away with twice.
O'Reilly is too extremist and inflammatory to win the presidency. He's also a pervert, which has alienated his former Christian self-righteous followers.
2007-08-05 09:13:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No thank you! And he would be a terrible debater...he would never let a person get in an opposing point.
2007-08-05 10:27:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by It is what it is 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He'd call the other candidates a bunch of "doo-doo heads" for their flagrant use of facts and then take all the microphones and run home....
*
2007-08-05 09:29:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by dreadneck 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Holy God!
Don't put ideas in people´s heads, PLEASE!
The current Republican candidates are bad enough.
2007-08-05 09:26:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tokoloshimani 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only if he was running against Ann Coulter.
2007-08-05 09:21:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by kolacat17 5
·
1⤊
0⤋