She is an insider, a globalist. None of them have an original thought they do as they are told by their handlers.
2007-08-04 18:44:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
She's hard to figure, someone with her education and proven abilities cant be as shallow and stupid as she seems since deciding to run. I think it might be the American political system, George the first had his "stay the course" mantra, Georgie boy mostly kept his mouth shut and preferred to be shown praying REALLY hard.
The secret to being elected these days is to get a catch phrase that any simpleton can grab onto, dont say or do anything original or interesting in any way, while, at the same time, being seen as standing for something.
I believe that I, Droopy Dog have mastered these seemingly contradictory points, and I have decided to throw my collar into the ring!
Peace with honour! A chicken in every pot! Droopy Dogs the one!
2007-08-04 19:05:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you'd actually pay attention to anything she says you'd find she's got more on the ball than you've ever dreamed of. She's got some great ideas and she's one brilliant capable lady. Now run along and think up some other stunning question to try and make her look bad. This one didn't quite do the job.
2007-08-04 18:52:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
She has a lot of sound bites stored in her memory card, but as far as original thoughts or plans of action, not much there. She probably will form a comittee to decide policies much as she did with her universal health care coverage fiasco she was involved with during bill's perpetration, (sorry, I meant ADMINISTRATION)
2007-08-04 18:51:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Of course! She is preoccupied with a particular secret service agent that is going to go down on her during her time on watch.
2007-08-04 19:06:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by George 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
>>>>>>Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos Does Not Disclose Hillary Clinton Conflict Of Interest In WP/ABC Iowa Poll That Ranked Ron Paul Second To Last
______________________________
From Washington Post:
______________________________
Washington Post-ABC News Poll-The Washington Post-Sunday, August 5, 2007
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp...ml? hpid=topnews
This Washington Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone July 26-31, 2007, among a random sample of 402 Iowans likely to vote in the Republican caucus. The results have an five percentage point margin of sampling error. Sampling, data collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, Pa. and J. Ann Selzer of Selzer & Company, Inc. of Des Moines, Iowa consulted on this project.
______________________________
Selzer and Company Lists Wal-Mart as one of their top customers and promotes that they use "art" as well as facts when creating polls.
______________________________
J. Ann Selzer of Selzer & Company, Inc.
http://www.selzerco.com/
Naturally, quality public opinion research is scientific. It is precisely measured, accurately tabulated, and meticulously reported. That's where many research companies stop. They ask the questions and give their clients the numbers. Period. That's not enough. You need insights and ideas you can use. That's where the art comes in.
Clients Include: Wal-Mart, Grace A. Dow Memorial Library of Michigan, American Press Institute.
______________________________
Hillary Clinton Served On Wal-Mart Board Of Directors For 6 Years.
______________________________
Hillary Rodham Clinton served on the Board of Directors at Wal-Mart for a Six-year tenure
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/2...f3a9c40& ei=5070
______________________________
Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos Never Disclosed This Relationship And Obvious Conflict Of Interest.
This shows that not only is Hillary Clinton have the capability to be connected to companies that can manipulate elections on various levels, she audaciously does not disclose these connections. Reminds me of Bush, Arbusto, and Bin Laden.
______________________________
Because of Ron Paul's consistent stand on the Iraq war [the largest issue facing Americans], he has been seen as the only GOP candidate that can beat front runner Hillary Clinton.
______________________________
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ arti...07candefeat.htm
http://www.gambling911.com/Onlin...aul- 052207.html
http://www.godlikeproductions.co...=8/3/07& forum=1
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/a.../25/ 289229.aspx
http://www.buchanan.org/blog/?p=787
http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au...ent/2007/06/12/
http://groups.google.com/group/a...1fe3f1? lnk=raot
______________________________
This answers any question of motif as to why Hillary would hide conflicts of interest between her and the Washington Post/ABC Iowa Poll that was used to:
1]Present an image of who is in the upper and lower tier of GOP Presidential Candidates so that more attention by the audience is given to those at the supposed upper tier.
2]Somehow justify Clinton's communications Director George Stephanopoulos [another obvious conflict of interest-but a disclosed one] only allowing a total of 2 minutes to Dr. Ron Paul in a 90 minute debate. He even revealed to all the viewers that he controlled the "green light" which timed candidates responses.
______________________________
These obviously powerful and compelling methods of creating artificial barriers in the election process should be disclosed to the American people so that our entire presidential election process is not compromised further than we have seen in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006. To see clearly whether or not we are living under a totalitarian dictatorship, this might be the first place to investigate
2007-08-06 05:18:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by informed 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps you have a comprehension problem because she says a lot and has great ideas. And she's not drunk which will be a pleasant change in the White House from the past six years.
2007-08-04 18:43:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mitchell . 5
·
5⤊
3⤋
Well, you are going to be one unhappy camper January 2009.
2007-08-04 18:50:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eisbär 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yet another well-reasoned criticism from a neocon...?
2007-08-04 18:59:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ ~Sigy the Arctic Kitty~♥ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are urban schools who can't get enough funding for books, teachers without credentials, and no after school programs.
College is too expensive for most urban or rural kids...and if they do graduate, they have 10,000 to 30,000 avg debt in their hands. It's no wonder these kids with degrees end up with jobs they don't want...they have tremendous debts to pay off.
And you think improving education is old???? WTF are you smoking?
2007-08-04 18:44:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋