2007-08-04 17:40:59 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
I like Pirlo better because if it wasn't for Pirlo we wouldn't even have qualified for next years champions league. Kaka is a great player as well.
2007-08-04 17:52:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kaka. Definately.
2007-08-08 07:33:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kaka
2007-08-05 11:16:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's difficult to compare them, because they play different roles. Pirlo plays deep playmaker; he can deliver great passes and help defensive line. He is very good in set pieces. Kaka, in the other hand, is a trequartista; he is a playmaker playing just behind the strikers. He is very fast and can score goals. But judging overall capabilities, I would rather choose Kaka because he has more complete abilities.
2007-08-05 14:31:17 · answer #4 · answered by r083r70v1ch 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kaka
2007-08-05 00:47:16 · answer #5 · answered by Red-devil69 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
hmmm . . . Pirlo's a really great player, but i'd have to say Kaka since he's a magician at goalscoring
2007-08-05 01:26:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think pirlo but becuase he can defend too unlike kaka but pirlo can't really score, but kaka is as good as pirlo at free kicks but kaka is younger but pirlo won a world cup. So i would say Pirlo
2007-08-05 02:13:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Kaka.
2007-08-05 07:11:50 · answer #8 · answered by sexy guy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Pirlo!!
2007-08-05 17:05:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A team needs 11 players to be successful not 1 or 2.
Sheesh by the same token, that means Gary Neville had some part to play in United's success last season.
2007-08-05 04:17:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋