I'm just wondering how many people with a decent education are against Barry Bonds.
2007-08-04 16:58:29 · 8 answers · asked by James W. 3 in Sports ➔ Baseball
I'm not trying to insult anyone. I'm just wondering if anyone can back up what they say with proof rather than making a statement based on anger or nothing at all. I personally don't care...just sick of hearing about it and want people to think about what they are saying rather than being a lynch mob.
2007-08-04 18:45:09 · update #1
I'm not trying to insult anyone. I'm just wondering if anyone can back up what they say with proof rather than making a statement based on anger or nothing at all. I personally am not asexcited about the issue as many people are ...just sick of hearing about it and want people to think about what they are saying rather than being a lynch mob.
2007-08-04 18:48:26 · update #2
per the dictionary.....
Fallacy......1 aobsolete : guile, trickery b: deceptive appearance : deception
2 a: a false or mistaken idea
3: an often plausible argument using false or invalid inference
Cheater.....1: to deprive of something valuable by the use of deceit or fraud
2: to influence or lead by deceit, trick, or artifice
3: to elude or thwart by or as if by outwitting
intransitive verb
1 a: to practice fraud or trickery b: to violate rules dishonestly
2: to be sexually unfaithful —usually used with on
3: to position oneself defensively near a particular area in anticipation of a play in that area
Or in the case of Barry Bonds.....to give oneself or team an unfair advantage. If everyone looks at Mr. Bonds stats you will see that he did not hit 50 homeruns (he was very very close a couple years) until he hit 73 in 2001. So you have to wonder were the pitchers that year just really really bad against him that year and they performed better against others elsewhere? Come on you have to see the bigger picture......Human Growth Hormone (HGH) may have been "allowed", I am sure that anabolic steroids were not.
Personally I could care less about it all. I do not like Bonds and its not an issue of race either. He is a very inconsiderate individual and only cares about himself and no one else.
2007-08-04 17:14:52 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i think some human beings stay below a rock in the event that they in no way heard of the Patriots cheating. besides, to respond to your question i think of Bonds is the bigger cheater. to not take something faraway from New England's cheating skills, yet Bonds holds substantial information that basically some gamers have a great gamble to break. on the beginning up of ever season, each and each soccer team has a great gamble to pass sixteen-0.
2016-11-11 06:18:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, and you're completely full of **** if you still think that Bonds is clean. It is a fallacy to believe that Bonds hasn't used anything, be it HGH or steroids or whatever concoction that BALCO came up with for him to use.
I am against Barry Bonds, and I have a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Washington. How decent is YOUR education? Don't throw any stones if your house is made out of glass, punk!. . . .
2007-08-04 17:08:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have a decent education and I know that Barry Bonds is a cheater. . Because of the my decent education I also know and understand what circumstantial evidence is.
There was more than enough circumstantial evidence available for the Commissioner to have sent Mr. Bonds into retirement.
I think that the reason that the Commisioner didn't do so is more about lack of willl than lack of evidence.
Mr.Selig had one excellent reason for allowing the cheating to continue ; his owners were getting rich because of it.
2007-08-04 17:21:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
THG was legal when he took it as the FDA had not banned it. It was banned in 2003. The haters fail to realize that fact!
Just like Hank Aaron took greenies (aka amphetamines) which were not banned at the time. Those are banned currently as well.
So people who use the word cheater just like the sound of it, because in reality it means nothing.
2007-08-04 17:01:52 · answer #5 · answered by Veritas et Aequitas () 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
he admitting to using a cream that contained steroids, that sounds pretty guilty to me. plus look at the difference in the size of his body.
2007-08-04 17:01:36 · answer #6 · answered by bsballfreak 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
he did not cheat did not break any regs back in the other days
2007-08-04 17:01:24 · answer #7 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
they probably don't even know where their neighborhood is on the map.
2007-08-04 17:06:17 · answer #8 · answered by Scooter_loves_his_dad 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋