We need to make more room to keep the violent ones in there. Lock 'em up for life.
2007-08-04 15:51:34 · 7 answers · asked by Helga G. Pataki 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Why not train them to work on the infrastructure of the country. I'm not sure how you define violent. What exactly is violent enough?
2007-08-04 15:56:36 · answer #1 · answered by tina 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We don't need to keep the violent ones locked up that cost to much tax dollars. Just put them all in a big room and gas them. Cheaper, no worries about escapes or getting out on good behavior.:)
2007-08-04 22:55:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Define 'nonviolent' criminals? Someone who robs a house (without a weapon) belongs in jail. However, people who are gulity of things like blackmail don't necessarily belong in jail, or people who cuss out a cop. It's a specific-situation basis.
2007-08-04 23:13:54 · answer #3 · answered by pampersguy1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The more violent criminals should be executed right away. This would make alot more room .
2007-08-04 22:57:07 · answer #4 · answered by therealhumantorch 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No we need to build more prisons, to keep all the criminals locked up.
2007-08-04 22:54:41 · answer #5 · answered by Sweet Suzy 777! 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not me.
Not unless they get their hand chopped off and are not allowed to get a replacement.
2007-08-04 23:01:11 · answer #6 · answered by Blessed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No someone who gets their 6th DUI should not get probation.
2007-08-04 22:55:55 · answer #7 · answered by seizod 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋