So far people seem content to out source our myths to off planet UFO sources.
No more underground or water based creatures, or home grown divergences from the tree of life.
Do you agree?
2007-08-04 14:24:44 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Caught me misspeaking. Of course unknown people can not be myths. I meant as no facts have been presented to date - off planet stories have replaced home born ones.
I'm busted...
2007-08-04 14:46:42 · update #1
Yes, I think life on other planets is true. It has to be. A myth no but a fact of probablity. I think we have learned so much about our planet we want to learn of more about life else where to prove something so fantastic that so many people have refuted. UFO's should be called IFO's because we know that we didn't create them as well as the crop circles of accurate proportional designs.
2007-08-04 14:37:45 · answer #1 · answered by Dan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I heard a young man say, in essence, to believe there can be no living organisms beyond our planet is stupid. (Perhaps we watched the same thing.) Scientists require physical proof, not anecdotes, however credible the persons who have observed "outer space" craft. The argument that there could be no governmental "cover up" conspiracy made me laugh. I mean, the government has never lied to us before, right? I won't even speculate what the motive would be, if that's true.The controversy about UFOs has been going on for many decades. It isn't really new. Frankly, if "aliens" are checking us out, I suspect they're curious about primitive life.
2007-08-04 23:31:34 · answer #2 · answered by Valac Gypsy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isn't god alien (off planet)? UFO enthusiasts needs to change their name from ufology to ufoism, since it has become a religion.
2007-08-04 21:40:57 · answer #3 · answered by phil8656 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋