Tired of sophomoric Bush and Hitler comparisons?

Question

Tired of the obvious? Lets see how sharp you people are. Lets try this for a change. What are the SUBTLE differences between Bush's and Hitler's brand of Fascism?

You guys are amazingly witty.
Great job !!!!

Answer 1

Hitler's brand of fascism made the jews the scape goats and targeted them.

Bush's brand of fascism is targeting poor people and muslims, and jews are very much part of the Bush administration and people like Wolfowitz, Pearle, Feith, Bolton, etc... have been an integral part of this fascist team.

Answer 2

Well I wouldnt go so far as to call Bush a fascist, but for the sake of argument...

Hitler was blatant and obvious about his brand of fascism. He came to power in a time when Germany was in ruins, with unemployment rates being very high and the country as a whole was discouraged and tired.

He promised strong leadership and the building of a vast German empire and gave the people a strong sense of pride in who they were ("Ayrans") He also (with the Hitler Youth and other programs) gave people a sense of order and belonging to a greater cause. He also conviently gave them scapegoats
to take out their anger on (Jews, gays, etc.)

In short, because of where Hitler came from and his life experiences, he believed in what he was doing, and he was a new, powerful force in German politics when he emerged.

Bush was born into money and power. The Bush family is an old Connecticut political family that is actually related to the Royal Family of Britain. George Bush grew up learning the tricks and tactics of politics, and, being assisted by masters like Dick Cheney and Karl Rove, he easily got the presidency twice. So he was brought up in the status quo of politics and preserves that status quo. Power is held by millionaire career politicians who serve their own interests.

Also, Hitler's tactics involved quite a bit of violence and intimidation of political enemies. Bush prefers more subtle moves and manipulation tactics. Violence against political opponents would rock the boat too much. The status quo must be maintained.

In short, the main difference is that Hitler was an aggressive political activist and agent for change in Germany. Bush on the other hand, is part of a political aristocracy and thus is not that radically different from any of his predecessors. Bush has an iron hand in a velvet glove, whereas Hitler had an iron hand, end of story.



**Another interesting difference is that Hitler wanted the people involved actively in creating an Aryan state that would dominate the region (and/or world). Programs and groups like the Hitler Youth, the Brownshirts, etc etc were designed to bring the people in. (The "desirable" people of course, not Jews or cripples.) After that, those people would join the Army, Luftwaffe, etc and somehow contribute to the War Machine and German superiority.

Whereas Bush wants the people to pay as little attention as possible to what hes doing and what the government is doing. He doesnt want the people involved and doesnt want them to know whats going on, hence the incredible secrecy of this administration. Thats Bush's biggest inherent contradiction. He doesnt want people to pay attention or sacrifice anything noticeable, and yet talks as though we're in the great battle for civilization.

Answer 3

the only similarities between the two is the two weren't militia management cloth. Hitler is a surrogate for cyber web trolls attempting to precise words in philosophy and not making use of a vocabulary. Bush is a type for trolls attempting to describe what a buffoon is. numerous the yank privateness rights have certainly been delineated, besides the fact that, in Nazi Germany, as in present day Germany, the splendid to vote replaced into by no ability taken remote from the prisoners that's opposite to united statesa.. Bush is born returned Protestant. Hitler replaced into Roman Catholic. And, that reflects that the two had hardly any similarities previous their occupation of being politicians.

Answer 4

Hitler was Outspoken, Bushe works Under the Cover of Executive Privilege. http://video.google.com/videohosted?docid=6952102263921897950

Answer 5

Hitler was a better speaker and had better uniform designers, BUT Bush's attempts to cause a war were much more sly! No one, except maybe Italy, bought Hitler's nonsense about how Poland had provoked him into war.

Answer 6

Hitler betrayed the Socialists in the National Socialist Party and sold out to the Krupps, Fokkers, and the rest of the industrialist.

Senator Prescott Bush was thier man in Congress, The Government considered jailing him for the duration.
Our George sold out the Conservatives in the Republican Party to Chevron, Exxon and Halliburton.

Answer 7

Hitler grew up in Austria, and Bush didn't grow up at all.
Hitler served in combat, and Bush didn't.
Hitler served time for his crime (the Munich beer-hall putsch) and Bush served no time for his drug possession.
Hitler was a spell-binding public speaker, and Bush, well...
Hitler was a vegetarian, and Bush is a vegetable.

Answer 8

Hitler hated Jews, Bush hates poor people.

Answer 9

Hitler didn't like Jews, Bush makes them his advisers.

Answer 10

Hitler was about war Bush is about starting wars.