Since stuff about OJ is in the news again this week, I will ask this for you forensic pros.......we all know the famous "If the glove won't fit, you must acquit!" used by Johnnie Cochran. Why did the prosecution/lawyers not use an identical brand and size glove to test it for themselves. Everyone knows that leather changes shape/size once it is dampened whether by water or blood. So the glove got damp and shrank. Use a similar glove of original size.
Why didn't the lawyers do that? If they had done that with the identical new glove...it would have been case closed! Any thoughts???
2007-08-04 13:02:00 · 3 answers · asked by donkey hotay 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
The outcome shouldn't have been based solely on the glove. There was plenty of other evidence.
2007-08-08 12:21:22 · answer #1 · answered by Jenn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why didn't the prosecutors do DNA testing of Jason, O.J.'s oldest son? He was about the same height and weight, so he could have fit the description given by an eyewitness viewing the crime scene at twilight. He was also the son of a black man and the step-son of a white woman. I'm sure that his schoolmates at his high school gave him more than a little grief about that. There's an adage regarding the solving of murders which goes back to the days of ancient Rome: "Cuit Bene?" (Who benefits?) Discover who that person is and you have (in most cases) found the murderer.
2007-08-04 21:57:50 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im thinking the lawyers may have thought of that one already surely ...........
On another note, I dont think Ron Goldman is coming out of this smelling like roses either. That man has dollar signs in his eyes!
2007-08-04 20:06:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋