English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bye week in ()
ESPN standard scoring (basically same as Yahoo!)
8 teams

QB - Kitna (6), Leinart (8)
RB - L. Johnson (8), Maroney (10), Benson (9), Jones-Drew (4), T. Henry (6), Turner (7)
WR - Fitzgerald (8), Houshmanzadeh (5), Colston (4), Evans (6), J. Walker (6)
TE - Winslow (7)
K - Gould (9)
D/ST - Raiders (5)

2007-08-04 12:57:30 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Fantasy Sports

To clear up some comments on the selection of players, Brees and Manning were taken in the 1st round (8th and 3rd, respectively), so when I picked at 4 I couldn't get Manning. Then Palmer went in rd 2 and Brady followed him. Then I decided that most teams were going to waste picks on mid tier QBs when they could have a higher tier QB. This is why I got Henry in round 6. I plan on trading him and my other backs and receivers for a top QB, when 1/2 the owners realize that they have no depth at RB or when the RBs start to get injured.

2007-08-04 16:10:25 · update #1

7 answers

I'd give you an 8 at this point, and I only cut that from a nine because I think you're lacking a top-tier quarterback.

Your depth at both RB and WR, though, should allow you to deal for a Brady-Brees type. I think you could package Henry or Benson with Housh or Evans to get a top QB, and that would still leave you with great depth at those positions. In that case, you'd have a 9 bordering on 10.

2007-08-04 13:07:48 · answer #1 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0 0

For a draft of 8 managers, your team is very disappointing. After getting Johnson, Maroney, and Benson there was no need to go after Jones-Drew and Henry while waiting for Kitna at QB and the Raiders Def. However, with 8 teams you can just use the best available defense for every week (checking matchups)

2007-08-04 21:17:42 · answer #2 · answered by nathanielwl 2 · 0 0

7

You lack depth at the QB position though I still think Leinart will surprise people. You have excellent depth at RB and at WR (I am interested to see if Colston was a fluke or the real deal). You could go a little stronger on the defense though.

Unfortunately a team with great depth at QB will beat a team with great depth at RB and/or WR 9 out of 10 times.

Package a couple of guys for a top tier QB and youll be hard to stop!

2007-08-04 21:06:33 · answer #3 · answered by engineco227 2 · 0 0

Ill say 9, and that is because your team is pretty solid except at QB, but with the depth you have elsewhere, you should be ok. (Not that Kitna is a slouch, just not a top 7 producer at QB). You should be in the hunt come playoff time. Good Luck!

2007-08-04 20:01:34 · answer #4 · answered by Lovely3800 3 · 0 0

I say 6.....that defense really pulls your team down. You have good QBs, good RBs, and OK WRs as a group. Great kicker because the bears offense can't score , so gould will get a lot of field goal oppurtunities this year

2007-08-04 20:37:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i like the rb and wr not so much the qbs nice k and a ok d/st

i would give it a 8

2007-08-04 20:20:48 · answer #6 · answered by John B 1 · 0 0

8 need newqb's and defense

2007-08-08 03:23:59 · answer #7 · answered by wolfpac4life090372 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers