English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

politics and Media in the USA .

2007-08-04 12:22:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

I haven't read Phil Kent's book yet, but I agree with the premise.

George Soros has no principles, he operates like a shark. He is heartless, duplicitous, and a very real danger. He has purposely destroyed entire economies in Asia by so brutally speculating against their currencies that the people there describe him as a "financial terrorist".

This is a man without a moral compass. Making a profit is fine, but this guy was out for blood. Imagine, millions of people who worked hard their whole lives in places like Indonesia became paupers overnight because he didn't just speculate against their currency to make a profit. He went for the kill. He destroyed economies that the U.S. then had to help finance to keep them from being crushed.

So, here's what the leader of the Liberal movement believes: In his new book The Age of Fallibility, Soros writes, “The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.” Soros thinks the U.S. is not a force for good in the world, so he wants to destroy the United States' ability to intervene in places that need help freeing themselves from dictatorships and tyranny.

He announced in 2003 that it is necessary to “puncture the bubble of American supremacy.” Soros is working systematically to achieve that goal. On the economic front, he is shorting the dollar in global currency markets, trying to force a devaluation.

George Soros is very, very dangerous.

2007-08-04 12:36:57 · answer #1 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1 0

Odd, when I went on line an researched Soros, no criminal record appeared.

Soros is a very skillful businessman who has made billions under the capitalist system. The unsupported statement that Soros is somehow a Communist is not consistent with the observable facts.

Your real problem with Soros seems to be that he has the money to shine a bright light on the slime you embrace as your political kinsman.

2007-08-04 12:38:04 · answer #2 · answered by fredrick z 5 · 0 2

I have a problem with any foreign national that spends that much money trying to tamper with our internal politics. I believe that the american political system should be left to the americans. Foreign funded organizations, entities, and individuals should be legally banned from advertizing or contributing funds for the purpose of affecting national policies or our political system. They dont have a dog in this fight so they should just stay out of it.

2007-08-04 12:35:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Rupert Murdoch controls most of the media in the US, but Soros is much more evil than Murdoch. Soros is an admitted communist and a convicted criminal.

2007-08-04 12:25:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

So i'm guessing human beings like those 10 boys to be punished, perfect? So who do you think of is punishing those spawns of devil, hmmm? i'm specific you comprehend the place i'm going with this... So I ask you this who's worse the single criminal, or the loads of thousands of people who do not do something while they have the possibility? i wish you're taking this the incredible way: not offensive, particularly and straightforward and impartial view.

2016-11-11 05:53:43 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No, but if Phil Kent really said that he belongs in a mental institution along with Annie-the-Tranny Coulter, OxyRush, Shrill O'Lielly and the rest of the lunatic right-wing fringe.

2007-08-04 12:27:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

He controls much of the far left by his support, but most people don't know this because his funds go through backend companies like media matters and such.

2007-08-04 12:40:38 · answer #7 · answered by austin 2 · 1 0

Yes he is!! I've read all about how he played a major part in Europes woes and now that he's broken them he wants to come here and do the same. Of course leave it to the liberals and the democrats to welcome him and give him safe haven! Right now he's financially is backing Obama!

2007-08-04 12:27:57 · answer #8 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1 1

I don't know about evil, but he is dangerous. Check out what he does to poor countries currency.

2007-08-04 12:44:29 · answer #9 · answered by Biggg 3 · 1 0

To make things fair, you can say the same thing about Rupert Murdoch.

2007-08-04 12:29:17 · answer #10 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers