the Sox keep adding more seats, but it doesn't look very roomy or comfortable at all. I live in the Seattle, WA area, and am an avid Mariner fan, and I feel fortunate that we have such a beautiful and spacious ballpark here, Safeco Field. I'm kinda a husky guy, at 6' tall 220 pounds, so I was kinda wondering what it would be like to see a game at Fenway? I'm picturing it being very cramped. Also, down the right field sections, don't you have to bend your neck to the left to see what's going on. The Monster Seats and Right Field roof seats look like nice additions, but who can afford that? except for the rich. At Safeco, I can get a good nosebleed seat for $12 and then sneak down a full level if I want. You can get away with things like that in big stadiums. Safeco sits 47,000 as oppossed to the what, 37,000 and change that Fenway holds. Also, I would think their are many obstructed and terrible view seats/standing room only sections there. If you've been to Fenway, tell me
2007-08-04
11:39:52
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Sports
➔ Baseball
if you recommend it or not? I think Wrigley Field in Chicago looks a bit roomier than Fenway. I mean when it was built almost 100 years ago, people weren't as fat as we are now. I just can't picture it a very comfortable place to sit for 3 hours and watch a game, unless if you can afford $100 tickets. Tell me your experiences about seeing a game at Fenway, and what was it really like?
2007-08-04
11:41:48 ·
update #1