2007-08-04 11:07:00 · 16 answers · asked by Bernd A 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Theater & Acting
Art is whatever you want to define it to be. A man peeing against the wall can be considered art by some. The screaming would fall into modern art.
2007-08-04 11:20:22 · answer #1 · answered by Michael K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would call it a group of people that come onto the stage and scream their lungs out randomly, not art.
2007-08-04 11:12:14 · answer #2 · answered by Salad F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is a kind of art. Look up the Dada Movement, or Antonin Artaud's 'Theater of Cruelty' and you'll see it's nothing new.
Art doesn't have to be entertaining to be art, or even -pleasant-. 8^)
2007-08-04 11:17:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is the same as a large group of naked people in a train station. some call that art. it is in the eye of those who see it. yes it is art, after a fashion.
2007-08-04 11:11:52 · answer #4 · answered by 1oldone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A re-creation of One Flew Over the Cookoo's Nest?
2007-08-04 11:10:52 · answer #5 · answered by Bev B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends. If it is an intrepretaion of some life experience by an individual who thinks it expresses his emotional reaction to that life experience, it could be an attempt at art. Whether it succeeds as art is another matter entirely.. It sounds like crap to me.
2007-08-04 11:36:26 · answer #6 · answered by Theatre Doc 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Art is an expression.
Foundamentally,...screaming can definitely be an expression.
It is created.
2007-08-04 11:12:58 · answer #7 · answered by Stony 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd call it the Plastic Ono Band
2007-08-04 11:14:43 · answer #8 · answered by Paul P 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not art that I would enjoy. But, I think that it is Art.
2007-08-04 11:18:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It may sound annoying, but, any form of creativity is art if y ou look at it.. It might not be your style, but then thats why it's different, 'creative'...and annoying..=P
2007-08-04 11:15:28 · answer #10 · answered by Johanna K 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋