2007-08-04 10:30:48 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No.
Other than where the other attack has already been launched, and you can preempt it from landing by completing your attack before they can complete theirs.
2007-08-04 10:34:49 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In rare cases yes, if you see that they are moving there military towards you and prepping for a war then yes, but if you "think" they want war no, just prepare for war. Israel did a "pre-emtive" strike in the 6 day war. I believe that was wrong, they started the war there could have been peace talks.
2007-08-04 17:38:02 · answer #2 · answered by Y.A.I. 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-08-04 17:33:38 · answer #3 · answered by Scott B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on the situation - how imminent the threat is, the scope of the threat, the validity of the intelligence, the risks and benefits compared to the risks and benefits of other options...
2007-08-04 17:35:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. The best defense is a good offense.
2007-08-04 17:33:52 · answer #5 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This latest one is going so well, I guess I'd be a fool to think they are a bad idea.
2007-08-04 17:40:56 · answer #6 · answered by Robert B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You bet your American azz. Hit them before they hit you.
2007-08-04 17:35:33 · answer #7 · answered by trf6x6 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is like getting an abortion before you are pregnant.
2007-08-04 17:35:35 · answer #8 · answered by cosmicwindwalker 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋