The war on drugs is a bottomless pit for our tax money, so is the war on terror.
2007-08-04 10:05:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes.
Both are wars against a behavior.
Which is like declaring marriage to a song -- looks great on paper, utterly meaningless in reality.
2007-08-04 10:15:48 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup.....
And I think that the "War on Terror" and the Patriot Act are reasons that some people think that it was an inside job.
Not defending them. I haven't read EVERYTING that has been reported about 9/11 to come to a truly educated decision about it. I see some points of the "conspiracy theorist" as well as those of people from the other side.
BUT....could Bush have gotten away with even 1/4 of the crap that he has done had it not been for 9/11 and his "War on Terror"?
2007-08-04 17:26:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both "wars" are ridiculous.
http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/2007/08/03/newt0803.html
I guess Newt is a liberal-commie now.
2007-08-04 20:02:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you bet ye.
2007-08-04 17:28:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋