2007-08-04 09:41:29 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Many people refuse to believe that one man could have gotten up one morning and decided to shoot the President. And then gone and done it.
If there was any evidence of a conspiracy, it would have come out by now. Every other secret comes out eventually. It's difficult to believe that many people would have been in on this one, and all have managed to keep silent for 44 years.
2007-08-04 11:19:30 · answer #1 · answered by wdx2bb 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A well known Cable News Journalist Greta Van Sustern did a Special Report on this very question for 2 hours. I believe it was entitled "Who Shot JFK"? This Report is inside of 2 years ago. Forensic Scientists have found that the single bullet theory is impossible. For the sake of the viewing public, they reviewed the site of the kill zone, then they created a computer model based on the explanation of the Warren Commission, they also showed a computerized enhancment of the famous "Zagruder film." The Warren Commission's explanation tells a different story than ballistics report, as well as the attending physician's notes. In addition, a single bullet does not square with the geometry of the shooter's distance and the speed and angle of the car. They also reviewed the measurement of sound of the tape with digital enhancement features. It was more than one shot.
The conclusion is that the official explanation of the actual shooting of the President is preposterous. This news special even went as far as to show a never seen before photo of JFK dead with his eyes open and bloody shirt. It was a neck and head shot. This was surprisingly graphic view of evidence. They went on to show the remaining bullet fragments and provided an analysis of the bullet and shattering of bone. This was chilling.
My thoughts. It was an inside job. It was our Government that had something to do with it. If you read about our Government's (CIA) assasination attempts of Heads of States, you can't put it past them. The Government will never admit wrong doing, not on U.S. soil. I can't tell you why, but I can tell you that the U.S. Government never admits guilt, not on the level of National Security failures. Even with 911, the "Government was portrayed as a victim", just like the common man, they were never wrong. Then the bi-partisian 911 Commission tells us a damning story.
It appears this was not merely a failure, but a rogue element has left it's finger prints. We know this through scientific and advanced technological means that are now at public/private disposal to drill down on the facts. With these facts in mind, the reason why Lee Harvey Oswald seems so improbable to have done it himself, is because he could not physically have done it himself anymore than the explanation of "the single bullet thoery," being a plausible explanation, when we now can digitally measure and hear more than one shot.
On the other hand, it is not wise for our Government to provide explanation for public consumption for the well being of the public. Look at the times we now live in. Our enemies have demonstrated capabilities far beyond the public's awareness, this is the case now and the same during the Kennedy years. And so, the Government is in a perilous position to put it's stamp of approval on how to kill a sitting President. It is not in the U.S. public's best interest in maintaining National Security and then analyze a breakdown of this same type security in the public arena. They have probably said all they can about the matter, because our hands are not clean elsewhere, even today. Their is a quote I believe to be fitting on the truth of the matter one way or another. James Russell Lowell once said, "Truth forever on the scaffold, wrong forever on the throne yet that scaffold sways the future and behind the dim unknown shadows is God watching over his own." Another poet by the name of James Carlyle put it this way,"Truth crushed to earth will rise again." For those that believe the words of the Bible, "You shall Reap what you Sow."
2007-08-04 13:09:57 · answer #2 · answered by mark_hensley@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that after the Cuban Missle Crisis in 1962, cooler heads on both sides realized Kennedy and Khruschev were both dangerously incompetent guys to be playing with nukes, and had them removed. Johnson and the CIA took care of Kennedy with an assassination in 1963 because you can't get away with an obvious coup in the USA, and Breshnev did pull off a coup in the USSR in 1964 and internally exiled Khruschev. And they probably averted another nuclear showdown in doing these things. Spreading the events out a year apart was probably to keep it from being so obvious.
2007-08-04 12:23:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
my wife's uncle was right there when kennedy was shot in dallas so many years ago. The uncle did everything by the book, he was killed in a flying accident where his flight was not filed.(a first in 22 years as an airforce pilot.) One of the material witness's that all died within a few days of the shooting.
I honestly believe that even if a tell all documentary, or book was to be published, the history is so poluted as to make it difficult at best and impossible in reality to know what really happened.
The folks shot on the ground in front of the knoll have never been publicly identified. I met a medical man who was there and apart from others telling me he treated the president you would not know it. He will not even admit he was in the ER when the president arrived.
Was there a cover up? I'm sure. Who did the killing? Don't know. Do know that there are those who can act with impunity.
2007-08-04 10:13:23 · answer #4 · answered by magnetic_azimuth 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He was shot and killed by Lee Harvey Oswald who took a bad aim with his rifle and missed killing his real target: John Connally. That's the man who, as Secretary of the Navy, approved Oswald's Undesirable Discharge in absentia from the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve after Oswald left the country without permission from Headquarters, Marine Corps.
2007-08-04 12:57:27 · answer #5 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i've got faith it replaced right into a tragic loss to our united states and the international. basically God knows what JFK could have accomplished in a 2nd term. I additionally experience that it replaced into no longer a conspiracy. i've got faith Oswald acted by myself. all the data helps a lone gunman.
2016-12-11 10:17:10 · answer #6 · answered by kostenbauber 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Will Never forget that Day. (While at work at Macy's In San Franciso, Calif.) The whole world stood still and was Crying> "everyone," as Soon As THE News Was Out..........
I always felt that Johnson Had something to do with It.!!
STILL DO.
2007-08-04 12:35:03 · answer #7 · answered by minnetta c 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was meant to be in our history books, years after we are all gone, someone will figure it out.
2007-08-04 12:27:58 · answer #8 · answered by reddot_coa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
back and to the left! Back and to the left.
2007-08-04 09:44:49 · answer #9 · answered by virgo82676 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't spend my time thinking about irrelevant things like that.
2007-08-04 09:44:19 · answer #10 · answered by Always Right 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋