The statement "everything has an equal but opposite reaction" is NOT Newton's third law. It is not even a law at all.
Newton's third law actually states (I'm paraphrasing here):
"Forces come in pairs. If there is one force, there is another, equal in magnitude and opposite in direction"
It applies only to forces, and only to forces as defined in the scientific sense. Death is not a force, in the scientific sense. The best way to think of forces are as a Push or a Pull on an object.
2007-08-04 09:29:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by lithiumdeuteride 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
no, death is an example of Cause and Effect, not an example of action and reaction. They're different things. And birth is not the opposite of death, it's something else entirely. So sorry but your question is meaningless as it is using the wrong parameters
2007-08-04 10:33:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by florayg 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You seem to be thinking in a somewhat fuzzy manner about Newton's third law of motion, which is stated differently from the way most people are taught.
But that applies to the motions of objects and the forces acting on objects in an inertial reference frame.
Your question has nothing to do with physical forces, and is, in fact, confused and garbled.
For a more valuable experience, press your ear against your girlfriend's bellybutton and see if you can hear the ocean.
2007-08-04 15:40:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by aviophage 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are confused. you are using the wrong terminology to ask your question. your question makes no sense. you ask equal but opposite "reaction for" death. the usual reaction to death is sadness. so the opposite is happiness. then you state population growth as something to do with demise of population. think your question through.
2007-08-04 09:36:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by 1oldone 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's simple really. The equal but opposite reaction to death is your eternal life on the other side. Makes sense to me ; )
2007-08-04 10:57:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by littlemama 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
death is not an action, it's an occurance. (most of the time)
2007-08-04 09:27:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by boyeed12 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Death is not an action, but rather the ceasing of actions.
2007-08-04 09:59:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in fact you're right,it's not equal,there are too many factors involved,diease,injury,disasters,shootings,wrecks,so it's not equal even though it's the exact opposite,who could say it wouldn't be eaqual without the outside influence factors?hard to tell,obviously it wouldn't at first,but would it eventually catch up?probablly not,,,,lol,and actually,doesn't apply to the intended purpose as you can see above
2007-08-04 09:31:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by chris 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
getting full insurance money in no time or a birth of a child (boy)
2007-08-04 22:45:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by rajesh m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
People refuse to attempt to think out of the cup (box is too normal!)
When something dies it becomes consumed by decomposers (somethings death let something else live!)
I die, worms eat me, birds eat worms, people eat birds, and round and round we go!
2007-08-04 11:40:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by JimBob 6
·
0⤊
1⤋