Why Doesn't Rudy Guilliani have one?
2007-08-04 05:02:43 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
For you experts so far he has not offered any yet.
2007-08-04 05:34:10 · update #1
Absolutely. Guiliani has one, but it is bogus.
2007-08-04 06:42:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should. Ron Paul has a plan. He's a doctor by the way and he knows from personal experience what's wrong with the system (Google Ron Paul and health care). His plan: Get the government out of health care altogether. Not only has government interfered with the doctor patient relationship but it has driven the costs up astronomically with all the hoops that the people in medicine have to jump through.
About Guiliani? I don't care what his plan is. Anyone who threatens the firemen with arrest if they don't stop searching for body remains when the search isn't even near completion, then turns around and immediately ships all the steel from these buildings to China before proper forensic evidence can even be completely gathered doesn't get my vote.
2007-08-04 19:54:58 · answer #2 · answered by Bloatedtoad 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the project with wellness care is the double digit value strengthen in step with annum. It has priced the coverage at a point it is problematical for small companies to pay. there are various motives for that strengthen. human beings stay longer. There are no longer adequate docs and those that are there belong to very great scientific communities that administration spending. Malpractice suits strengthen coverage and extra importantly strengthen the exams and the fees of processing to maintain the suits down. government rules make the value of working an coverage agency so high priced that in basic terms some can proceed to exist and that they might desire to strengthen the fees. Obama has a plan to have a convention of each and every of the events that would desire to talk the matters on stay television and then they could attempt to come back up with a plan to cut back costs and get coverage to truly each and every person.
2016-10-09 05:06:12 · answer #3 · answered by bruinius 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Rudy Giuliani's health care plan entitled "a free market cure for a US health care system" he states "Americans without employer-based insurance, or those who would rather have individual coverage, should enjoy the same tax benefits as the 175 million Americans with employer based coverage.
Out of these 175 million Americans there are many whose tax breaks and their corporations tax breaks far exceed my yearly income. I cannot understand how this will possibly help the majority of the population; the working middle-class.
He then states "we can do this through a new tax-free income exclusion up to $15,000 for Americans without employer-based coverage." I do not have $15,000 a year to spend on either medical treatment or insurance.
2007-08-04 06:14:47 · answer #4 · answered by pacer 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He has a plan on his campaign web site and the New York Times did an article on it yesterday.
I am guessing because it is not a socialist system you don't think it counts. The idea that the government can administrate anything this big is ridiculous, the idea of medical savings and pre tax money goes a long way with me.
2007-08-04 05:28:32 · answer #5 · answered by Reston 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it's too big a problem, too profitable and too corrupt. he can't fix it and would be a disaster to try.
this doesn't mean i don't think there should be one. i think there should but we can expect to pay for it . i'm not sure if it matters if you pay ten more percent of your income to them to fund a health care or if you pay ten percent of your income and then purchase private insurance.
either way we are going to pay. maybe make it like auto insurance. if it is the law to have it , then someone has to provide it ? not sure where the answers are / it is a huge problem and one that needs to be addressed.
2007-08-04 05:19:36 · answer #6 · answered by Mildred S 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. He obviously has a health care plan, one of the oldest known health care plans in fact, with a much longer track record than any insurance company.
2. Even with health care, people die anyway.
3. What's it to you?
2007-08-04 05:14:27 · answer #7 · answered by open4one 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes they should, one is needed badly but one that can realistically be financially implemented.
NOT the socialized health care modeled after the EU.
2007-08-04 05:45:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should have a health care reform plan. Not a socialistic new approach.
2007-08-04 05:12:58 · answer #9 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
It is too important of an issue not to.
Who ever doesn't, isn't putting our health as a priority.
2007-08-05 18:39:33 · answer #10 · answered by Threeicys 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that if they do have one it shouldn't be free. I think everyone should have to pay for health insurance including the poor. It shouldn't be free. The rest of us have to pay for ours and it wouldn't be fair that someone gets theirs for free
2007-08-04 05:18:25 · answer #11 · answered by John 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋