instead of protesting medical clinics.. why don you lock arms and guard cemeteries, we'll see how dedicated you are to life then!
"No.. sorry, she cant come in"
"but sir.. shes 97 and got hit by a bus"
"no, sorry,,,, we have options"
2007-08-04 04:55:28 · 18 answers · asked by death_by_stereo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
you're not a human until you're in my phone book
2007-08-04 05:05:22 · update #1
LOL. that's funny! unfortunately, they only are pro life when its a blob of undistinguishable cells, not a real person!
2007-08-04 05:00:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 8⤋
yet you pass staggering on attempting to tension human beings to create all this "life" you care plenty approximately. ^^^^^ we are forcing human beings to have irresponsible intercourse??? you're a stupid individual in case you think of that. What i think of is sensible are having dropoffs for undesirable toddlers. Any baby a individual isn't able to shield, financially have sufficient money etc... could properly be dropped off no questions asked. They already have carried out this in diverse places. it rather works properly. I help financially besides as by using donating components a life service sanatorium so i'm no longer basically available retaining an ant-abortion sign. I actual have talked to 3 of the extra youthful mothers or maybe after the toddlers are born supplied any service i could desire to offer for them. we want extra human beings however... if we each and each took this style of care no count number if or no longer this is financially sponsoring them (provide up one cup of Starbucks each and every week ) or counseling, praying with, giving time and in spite of materials we could desire to constantly help those mom's and toddlers alongside. Abortion shouldn't exchange into inhabitants administration. If the church homes are those making the communities extra sensible then they could desire to be supported by using the state for classes they could desire to have funded. perhaps take some monies removed from the ACLU, happy, PETA...etc... and use it to maintain lives extremely than to combat for the rights of adults who're already living and function own agendas that don't help a soul.
2016-12-11 10:03:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Protesting at abortion clinics seems more likely to save lives to me. Every once in a tragically long while a woman will listen to a sidewalk counselor and find a better option. One in a million is still a life saved. Can't save a dead 97 year old by protesting her funeral.
I'm a lot closer to 97 years old than I am to -9 months old, and I don't see how I can trust our society to protect the few years I have remaining if it is not willing to protect the century of life an unborn child has the potential to live.
A lot of prochoicers say to leave a woman alone to a heart wrenching decision. If the decision is so heart wrenching, and I believe it often is, then it seem more compassionate to offer a better choice. One idea that would seem to satisfy the STATED objectives of both sides would be to develop nonlethal methods of terminating unwanted pregnancies so women won't have to endure 9 months of unwanted pregnancy and the unborn won't have to lose a potential century of life (according to longevity projections for those born today).
If you are ever willing to consider that both sides have valid concerns, feel free to join the discussion at http://www.yaktivist.com .
2007-08-04 05:08:54 · answer #3 · answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
A refreshing new argument. I haven't seen anyone present this particular line of reasoning before.
It might be because it is so specious and meritless, but it could also be because even a ventriloquist's dummy would see the logical flaw in the analogy.
Are you trying to be funny? It didn't work.
2007-08-04 04:58:31 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 8⤊ 3⤋
Are you trying to equate the death of a aged person with the murder of a unborn child?
2007-08-04 05:41:42 · answer #5 · answered by Bill 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Pretty hard to figure out what you're getting at. Try again once you sober up.
2007-08-04 04:58:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
What a stupid scenario. At least she got to live 97 years!!! She wasn't killed before she could even come out of the womb whole. Why on Earth would you or anyone think that abortion is morally acceptable?
2007-08-04 04:58:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 4⤋
Incest and the huffing of gold spray paint have crippled your mind
2007-08-04 05:02:10 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It's one thing to murder an unborn child, but not to allow a person that has died their final resting place is another. what you said makes no viable sense.
2007-08-04 05:03:29 · answer #9 · answered by youngscrn 2 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Congratulations on the dumbest post of the day!
2007-08-04 04:58:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I am Anti-Abortion, not Pro-Life. If someone deserves to die, be my guest. Under no circumstances does a unborn child DESERVE to die. There's a difference.
2007-08-04 05:04:31 · answer #11 · answered by TJ815 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋