I hope so. He would certainly enliven the debate and bring a lot of attention to the republican race.
2007-08-04 07:12:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by barry c 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Newt Gingrich has one of the most brilliant minds in politics. He masterminded Republican wins in the House and Senate. Alas, it didn't take long before a couple of his peers screwed it up.
He will be a good candidate. At this point, I'm not sure he has enough support to win the nomination.
2007-08-04 05:42:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Matt 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I had a real problem with Gingrich during his last year in office and since then. He seems to be trying to destroy other Republicans over the years as a media consultant. Plus I think he wasted the advantage the Republicans had when they took over control of the House. SO I really would not want him to enter the race.
2007-08-04 05:22:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The man has more brains, decency, compassion, and ethics than all the democrat candidates combined, as well as half of the other Republicans.
I have met the man in person, heard him speak numerous times, and I can tell you he would be an excellent president. Too bad the lying, left-wing hate machine known as the mainstream media will smear him up one side and down the other...
2007-08-04 04:55:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dee B 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Sorry, yet your argument in choose of a Gingrich presidential run is incorrect in the severe. Newt became between the architects of the failed "settlement with u . s . a ." that became the style of fulfillment in the Republican congressional takeover in the ninety's. yet as quickly as in ability those "conservatives" consciously desperate to no longer do something too 'radical' (like ending the welfare state or re-asserting states rights over abortion) using fact they feared such an schedule could harm them politically and could fail to guard a White homestead victory in destiny election cycles. Their timidity is easily documented. with the objective to assert that fluctuate (possibly you will possibly desire to assert "stable exchange") will in basic terms come whilst the yank human beings act rather of conventional politicians, yet then call for them to act by utilising helping a common American baby-kisser like Gingrich, is better than in basic terms slightly stupid. you assert to us: “supply up on politics as huge-unfold and vote for this existence long baby-kisser who has shown himself to be a compromising conservative.” you assert that Gingrich is familiar with the authentic nature and choose for for reform. yet there's a community the place he's woefully twisted and thoroughly incorrect... His distant places coverage is the comparable previous crap we've been putting up with for some years now; he favors extra distant places interventions and undeclared conflict - which violates the very shape that Gingrich claims desires to be upheld. He says massive government is a failure. He says massive government is wasteful and can't do something suitable. i think he's authentic in this. yet are you able to no longer see the profound contradiction inherent in his positions between kinfolk and distant places coverage??? regionally, massive government is a undesirable... yet whilst it is composed of distant places coverage, massive government and American empire is physically powerful. Excuse me, what??????
2016-10-09 05:03:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think he has learned a lot from his past, but those who forgive and excuse Clinton, will not be afford him the same courtesy.
i have watched several interviews and he seems to present lucid, logical solutions to many issue. he has criticized both sides for being inept and refuting logic but i don't think he would be able to withstand the negative press he has gotten and we are losing a viable asset.
2007-08-04 05:09:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Answer: His participation is more to make a point during the campaign then the concept of winning! They also serve, those that intentionally lose to expose the truth! Can you say Ron Paul..O.K. The honourable Doctor NO!
2007-08-04 05:00:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I consider myself just a Republican more than conservative, but I would be more than willing to hear what he has to say.
He might be a decent candidate with experience and know how.
2007-08-04 06:29:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Newt is one of the most brilliant political minds we have. Don't think he is electable (too many uniformed voters out there)..........that is why he would be an AWESOME Secretary of State!
2007-08-04 05:02:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Newt can toy all he wants, but an exploratory time period will reveal serious resistance, even from loyal Republicans.
Newt stepped on his dummy, big time, with his "contract for America". It proved to everyone that he either lacked a huge amount of common sense, or was really out of touch with both the American people and his own constituency !
2007-08-04 04:43:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋