my bet is that she'll do just about what President Bush is doing.
BUT she'll make lots of noises about it being different and the press will claim it is different and "better".
what nonsense!!
2007-08-04 03:25:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Spock (rhp) 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
i'm a non-Muslim American and that i will assert i'm happy the united states of a is battling the Taliban - between the worst abusers of human rights in cutting-edge historic past. i think of Saddam might desire to have been overthrown, however the united states of a and the united kingdom might desire to have left Iraq after the hot government became sworn in. There is incredibly no longer a floor invasion of Iran. It won't get adequate public help (in the united states of a or the united kingdom) and there are not adequate infantrymen for it. Iran is three times the size of Iraq and a floor invasion could be a huge militia operation. One they are able to't have the money for to do, in terms of troops and money. If there are airstrikes against Iran's nuclear centers, there will be riots in the united kingdom using fact the value of gas there will be $12 USD a gallon. (the metric equivalent of a gallon). in the united states of a the value will flow as much as approximately $8 USD a gallon. whilst that occurs, no person would be waiting to have the money for to fill their gas tanks to flow to artwork, and the susceptible economic device might desire to be paralyzed. So, i don't have faith the individuals or the united kingdom will attack Iran.
2016-10-09 04:59:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by fauntleroy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A better question is what will she do for the USA?
Our government is in shambles. The Democrats want to give Legal American tax payers money to illegals. Our borders are not secured. Our infrastructures are crumbling. The pentagon can't account for 19 billion dollars given to Iraq. People in this country are dying from lack of affordable health care. Good jobs are leaving the country and being replaced by low wage jobs. Remember, it was Bill Clinton who passed NAFTA, that started the flow of good jobs out of the country. The government wants to cut benefits to legal elderly who have worked a life time, and give them to illegals.
Where is the candidate who will speak for the legal middle class in this country?
2007-08-04 03:59:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by jackie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
By the time the next president and congress is elected all of the current situations will be different. Any 'plan' at this time will be out dated by then. All of the canditdates have expressed a general set of principles that may be realistic today, but will be out of date down the road. A lot can happen in two years and will. Remember that old joke....."....I could die, the king could die, or the horse could learn to talk!"
2007-08-04 03:40:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
She wants to pull all the troops out of Iraq and get them killed in Darfur.
2007-08-04 04:14:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
statements. American on the whole do not want to withdraw troops because the job is not done. Clinton has no plan other than to be president. Make no mistakes on this fact.
2007-08-04 03:26:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
^^That canidate is Ron Paul, He's known to be the taxpayers best friend.. and is an advocate for the middle class... This country at the moment is a disaster.. we are in huge amount of debt... we need someone who's going to make change, not just make faulty promises
2007-08-04 04:05:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
We will still be in Iraq for several more years with clinton as president. However, there would be no "surging" going on.
2007-08-04 03:48:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by PD 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Great Question. But I will take it one step further I have yet to hear her plans on ANYTHING! But as far as foreign pollicy everytime Obama comes out and says something concrete she always gives a political rebuttal without giving us her thoughts
Ex:
Will you be willing to speak to dictators?
Obama: I would we should talk to our friends and enemies
Hillary: I dont want to be used for propaganda. I will not promise to meet with anyone at that high a level.
Will you use Nukes?
Obama: Nukes should never be on the table
Hillary: We should not talk about the use or non use of nukes
Now Obama has given us his plan to fight terrorism and Hillary, who authorized the war and has been running for president for four years havent given us anything with meat. Please someone who supports Hillary give me her plan.
2007-08-04 03:29:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bye-Partisan 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
There is no major candidate that will change the foreign policy that lead to this war.
They WANT this war. She voted for it. Her husband signed a resolution for regime change in Iraq.
Hillary (and Obama too) are pro war.
Direct your anti-war votes to Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, and Mike Gravel.
2007-08-04 03:34:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by k X 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
The momentum of the previous term will make the existing operations go on for a while. I think, if she is chosen, US willnot atteck Iran.
But on the other hand, who knows? She is one tough lady.
2007-08-04 03:26:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by Totally Blunt 7
·
0⤊
2⤋