Further proof that Kanye West hit the nail right on the head.
2007-08-04 03:17:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This give Bush another one of photo ops. Beware of politicians bearing gifts.
2007-08-04 04:34:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The day of the disaster it was published that the President would not come until the conditions were more stable. Traffic would be a issue and it was a time of sorrow and grief and they were still trying to sort things out. Why can't you just give him a break ? No matter what he does is not good enough for some. One question on here says it is a waste to come and another says he should have gone earlier. Bush derangement syndrome in action on both. Good source on Kenye West ?
2007-08-04 03:25:45 · answer #2 · answered by meathead 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Bush will declare the Bridge became in Iran (or a matching Oil prosperous u . s . a .) and flow the national preserve in (with Marine, military, and army, and Air help). FEMA will Arrive on the Scene in the last decade to Render prompt assistance. Cheney will shoot somebody at Random. we can might desire to eliminate Bridges out of your guy or woman or bags whilst stepping into the Airport. Congress will positioned off for study....ummm...even if that's...for extra important matters on the table. Hillary will dress much extra (i choose for to apply a be conscious for a dam in Holland, yet i'm going to get in hassle)-ish. bill gets a....properly all of us be conscious of what Jeb Bush will call the bridge a striking Chad. Prof. Hawking will instruct the Bridge the two Did and did no longer Exist on the Momment it Fell. Queen Elizabeth will nonetheless no longer supply-up the Throne. And a Small Pot of flora will flow "Oh No, no longer back"
2016-10-09 04:59:39 · answer #3 · answered by fauntleroy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, I believe there is a difference between the POTUS going to Minneapolis where ONE bridge collapsed or a WAR ZONE where gangs of thugs were shooting at anything that moved. For a blue state, the Minnesotans were helping the victims--not looting, robbing and pillaging. Big difference.
2007-08-04 04:07:26 · answer #4 · answered by Cherie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why does Bush need to show up at all? The bridge is a state issue, and is paid for with state taxes. Perhaps, if Minnesota had not spent more money on illegals and abortions than it did it's roads and bridges, this type of thing would not be happening.....
2007-08-04 03:26:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Gee, I wonder if the president is going to visit the bridge that collapsed in California on the 31st too? Why isn't that getting much press.
2007-08-04 03:29:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the heck did you think he was going to do, clear debris, or help with the search.
I agree that it was a tragedy, but Bushes visit was strictly symbolic, a show of concern, and support.
He is still running your country.
2007-08-04 03:21:56 · answer #7 · answered by bgee2001ca 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Let me get this right, Bush hates black people so he decided to wait til today to visit the 35W Bridge in Minneapolis?
Take the tinfoil hat off dude.
2007-08-04 03:20:23 · answer #8 · answered by Jeremy A 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
It's already been handled. There's no reason to pick on Bush and use this tragedy for political gain.
2007-08-04 03:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by Granny Gruntz 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
And had he NOT gone, you bashers would have had a bigger hay-day. He would then have been accused of 'hiding' out. Geeeeeeeez... Although I'm not a bushbot, I don't waste my time like you do.
You people crack me up. :)
2007-08-04 03:22:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋