coz believe it or not there is TONNES more evidence AGAINST the American Government than the terrorists!!!!
eg- the structure of the towers should have been able to withstand the plane crashes AND they collapsed level by level, just like it would if BOMBS were placed in there!! if they collapsed from the planes, they would have tumbled.
2)the tape of Osama Bin Laden talking about planning 9/11 shows that it cant have been him. he is right handed, in the tape he was left and more..!!
3) bombs culd have been placed coz b4 9/11 they had heaps n heaps of security drills n that wen every1 was evacuated. this was tym 4 them 2 b able 2 plant bombs.
4) fire culdnt have made towers collapse coz the temperature was no way near hot enough to melt the frames, as proved by specialists in that area.
there is still so much more evidence i cant fit here!!!
but behind all these reasons is why the gov. wuld want 2 do this. they wanted a reason to start war with Iraq! u neva noe!
2007-08-04
02:47:02
·
25 answers
·
asked by
lleyton988
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
F.Y.I
THIS DOESNT MEAN I BELIEVE IT WAS THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT!
2007-08-04
02:52:53 ·
update #1
CAN EVERYONE LAY OFF????
I AM NOT SAYING I BELIEVE IT WAS THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT!!!
STOP CALLING ME A STUPID IDIOT AND ACTUALLY READ WAT I AM SAYING PROPERLY!!!!
AND F.Y.I IN MY COUNTRY, WE SPELL TONNES AS TONNES!! YOU MAY DO IT AS TONS FROM WHERE YOUR FROM!
2007-08-04
03:00:01 ·
update #2
okay everyone, read this calmly.
ok.
i am asking this to see what everyone has to say. i personally dont believe it was the American Government. I have just been watching documentaries stating all of this with everyone. this documentary was made in america and i therefore wanted to noe wat americans thought.
2007-08-04
03:08:20 ·
update #3
Moscara never let this people call you such dirty things!!!
What is this crap with school and education..."We don't need no education, lots of hazards in the classrooms" - Pink Floyd
People you make me sick to my stomach...let me explain you why...
1) Moscara is right about bombs and explosion! How did those bombs got placed into the towers...2 weeks before the actual event...there special evacuation drills within towers...but drill were held without dogs...
2) Those to flights were not even registered in the airports...those two empty planes made you think b.s...
3) How is it that when there was no actual gsm mobile connection inside of the planes till year 2004...in year 2001 people called their relatives from cell-phones...
4) Owner of the towers Silverstein signed a lease of buildings for 3 billion $ + insurance policy that could cover terrorist attack results (this happened two weeks before the event)
5) Osama Bin Laden got treatment in Dubai American Hospital and his father had very close relations with Bush family...(Probably this is why Americans hate Michael Moore he uncovered the real faces of those who cared only about oil!) Why does is hurt you people...truth is Bin Laden family financially supported Bush's business before he got to white house...
2007-08-04 03:14:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by josh k 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
You must live in Roswell!! Arguing with conspiracy theorists like you is useless. You believe the Bush administration is evil.
The US government did't need a "reason" to go to war with Iraq. Iraq violated the terms of the cease fire at the end of the first gulf war. Go to the UN website and look at the resolutions. Why is it so difficult for you to believe that there are people out there that want to KILL all the Americans that they can?
And in response to #4, do you remember when the tanker truck full of gasoline wrecked and burned on an overpass? The fire burned hot enough to weaken the steel through the concrete and cause the overpass to colapse. Steel loses it's tensil strength at a lower temperature than it takes to melt it.
Once the first floor colapsed, the lower floors couldn't take the additional shock.
For all your "evidence" there is more evidence to prove you wrong.
Edit:
If it's tonnes in you country, then don't try to expand worthless conspiracies in our country. Go back and read what you wrote, it implies that our government was behind it.
2007-08-04 03:02:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by madd texan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You need to learn to distinguish between an assertion and actual evidence.
First of all, the justification to invade Iraq existed under Clinton. It didn't take 9/11 to cause years of violation of UN Resolutions.
Second, do some math on the idea of placing explosives in the towers. Two buildings, 110 floors, four supports on each floor (at the corners). How much time do you want to allow for the placing of each charge? Say, five minutes with another five minutes between locations? That's 146 hours. As you reduce that time by adding more teams, you geometrically increase the probability of someone talking by now, or someone noticing at the time.
Third, and there's more but this is all your idiocy is worth, the buildings were supported at the corners. Had demo charges been placed there, those explosions would have been obvious on the videotapes.
2007-08-04 02:55:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by open4one 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
i dont think it was our entire govt but i do believe that "certain entities" within the govt and outside the govt are the culprits
think about it why did mr bush and chenney meet with the 9/11 comission together and were not under oath and it wasnt recorded ? and none of the comissioners had anything negative to say about the report after that ... when just a few weeks before some of them said that they thought this was an inside job?
busha nd chenney had a hand in this but they didnt plan it out
its probably a secret organization ya i know this sounds like everyother conspiracy theory
but..there is a group of people out there with certain agendas and have the capabillities and resources to achieve them
why did a congressmen who was working on impeaching bush because he thought he had a hand in this suddenly die?
the guy was poisened! someone didnt want him to talk
ya there is a group of people out there who want to control the govt and have been doing so for generations and they have found teh perfect way to do it
1) a central bank to control the money supply and teh economy
2) an enemy such as communism and now terrorism to keep the people under their control
why do u think this war on terror exists? after 9/11 the executive branch recieved more power than it has EVER had that means that on top the freedoms that we now lost we also lost the abillity to say what our govt can and cannot do!!
thomas jefferson said it best
Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have ... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases.
Thomas Jefferson (1743 - 1826)
tahst the case we now have we are so afraid of terrorists that
we are willing to give up our freedoms to fight them
that is what the people who perpetrated 9/11 wanted
2007-08-04 17:13:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by antelias 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK Sweetie, since it's a Saturday and I have a little time, let's go through this.
Are you saying that out of the several TONS of explosives needed to take down each tower, no one saw ANYTHING?
Of the 600 or so passengers on the planes, they are all being held somewhere, or have been murdered?
That the cell phone calls from the planes that day were all faked?
Just to make it look good, the "conspirators" crashed another plane in Western PA?
Here's another question for you. How many people do you think it took to pull all of this off?
And none of these folks, NONE, have ever had an attack of conscience or even a possible death bed confession for perpetuating a crime of this magnitude?
Sorry hon, that dog don't hunt.
2007-08-04 02:56:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mark A 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Old news and old theories never die, but should. You need to get a grip. Did not you see when the truck exploded in California the other month ? Guess what ? The concrete and the steel twisted and melted in the explosion. These were Temps. similar , but not as hot to the trade centers. How do you explain the bombing in the 90's. was that a practice run from our Government ? The explanation has been shown several times on how the towers fell from its own weight. people like you just have to have a fantasy. maybe it is from watching all those Hollywood action movies. If you are looking for a enemy, it is the Islamic Nazi radicals that want anyone who do not believe in their control dead . It is that simple and we cannot take them for anything but their word. They hate us and want us dead. Quit living in a Hollywood world and deal with reality.
2007-08-04 02:56:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by meathead 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am not sure, but it sure looks like an inside job. If it is not then it is a retaliation to someone being doublecossed in bad business deal.
Just because there were passengers with Arabic surnames on board those planes, does not mean that they could not have been working for entities within the USA or elsewhere.
For the sake of argument, on the surface, if the attack was from outside the USA, there were and still are plenty of people with plenty of good and bad reasons to attack. Consider the symbols attacked represent the both parts of the "Industrial Military Complex," that Pres. Eisenhauer warned about upon leaving office.
From inside the USA, the employees of Enron who lost most everything they had, could be suspects, along with union, non-union workers, ex-union workers, underemployed workers, unemployed, uninsured citizens, bancrupt citizens, systematically mistreated cirizens, and the disenfranchised citizens. Oklahoma City was tragic and a tragic embarassment simutaneously.
I have never known Osama Bin Laden to lie the USAmericans. In the USA, the presidents and other politicians, past and present have an historical habit of lying and spinning the lie, to these citizens to achieve their goals.
The masses of USAmerican common citizens as it is the case elsewhere with other common citizens throughout history, are expendable. They really do not matter. They are useful as buffer zones,cannon fodder,or experimental laboratory subjects.
There is are historical precedents or putting common people in harms way for material gain. In British Colonial America, imigration was allowed to increase the buffer-zone between slaves and masters, as well as between the aristocracy and indigenous inhabitants (Native Americans).
Notice that many of the cities in the USA have the prefix "Fort" in the name. That is due to USA expansion forthe purpose of gaining the resources of the land to be conquered. If you tell common people to settle in that section where you have done some damage to the indigenous people, you will have an excuse to answer to a retaliation from the attacks on the common people that you have knowingly put in danger.
If there is a way to spin and pin any disaster in the USA such that it will defy moderate scrutinization it will happen. "We will monitor the situation, for terrorist activities."
I wonder:
Who would dare attack a well armed insane asylum?
Follow the money.
2007-08-04 04:11:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by LeBlanc 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I can see your point. It make sense to me. rumour say some extreme right winger did this. Juz like wht you said, they need an excuse to start a war. This is consipiracy. Some other say Bush did it. He is a cold-blooded evil & i'm not shocked if he did it to start a war & gained the support of angry americans.
Back to the old days when Iraq invaded Kuwait, old Bush sent an army to middle east after Iraq had fully taken over the place He then kicked Saddam's a-s-s but didnt kill him. After tat, US took control of Kuwait's oil, got some huge weapon deal from middle east & taiwan. Some ppl say the us goverment motivated Iraq to invade Kuwait, beczo they needed a war badly to sell his weapon & to control oil price. Hey, Us hv spy satellite tat could identify a person by taking a pic from space. When Iraq stated to move it army towards kuwaitt, they should hv already noticed it from Satellite & could warn Kuwait. And Saddem was no idiot. If you were him, will you invade a country tat is under the protection of US. I guess there's must be something behind all these and it made sense to me that the war between Iraq & Kuwait was controlled by US.
after decades, another Bush followed the trait of his father & needed an excuse to start a war.....
Dont get mad if you disagree!! Even bush or right winger didnt plan it, you cant rule out the chance that they knew somebody was planning 911 but they didnt stop it becoz they wanted to go to war.
conclusion, i dun think US government did this but i'm sure the war in middle east is not a revenge, it's jus becoz of Oil
2007-08-04 03:07:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Roy K 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't believe you, or Michael Moore. I think you both have an agenda to bring down a sitting president during a war. I know people who are personally volunteering to go over there to fight terrorism. I work with them everyday, I admire these people and pray for them everyday. I do not believe that our own government would do such a thing. maybe I am naive, but I love my country. If you don't then leave. I'll come help you pack.
2007-08-04 02:55:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Monte T 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Maybe the fact that we saw them. My Friends and relatives in the Pentagon and WTC saw the planes coming in?
And Myself and many other sailors were yelling about why the govt didn't do anything about them in 2000. You know when the Cole was hit.
Or do you believe Bush did that too.
2007-08-04 02:53:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by WCSteel 5
·
3⤊
0⤋