To cons who say if we leave Iraq the terrorists will come over here, aren't U admitting that Bush can't keep..

Question

us safe here? Do you really think we can be attacked from outside?

Dede: 9/11 was an attack from the inside, more proof that Bush didn't keep us safe.

BTW: The ones who perpetrated the WTC in 1992 under Clinton are in prison now. The ones who did 9/11 are probably in Pakistan. The USS Cole was done by terrorists, but if Bush had been pres. then, he would have just attacked a sovereign nation was nearby so that Americans would cheer instead of intelligently finding who did it.

Answer 1

they don't get it...somehow attacking iraq will make a terrorist from saudi arabia cancel his flight here

Answer 2

something is achieveable in at present's activities worldwide. because of the fact the Cubbies have not finished lots of something in over a century and the reality that the White Sox look the aggressive franchise, it could take place. The down side for historic motives often is the shortcoming of Wrigley container. of direction no person believed that the old Yankee Stadium would sometime be basically a memory. Such is the worldwide of activities enterprise. it may be annoying to think of no Wrigley container or for that depend not greater Fenway Park. i think of it may be a distinctive tale or no tale in any respect if the Cubs have been triumphing pennants and a worldwide series now and then. of direction that hasn't handed off.

Answer 3

That's very twisted thinking, my friend. You want Bush to leave Iraq and then blame him if we get attacked on our soil, because he didn't get the job done.

And of course we can be attacked from the outside. Such complacent...even egotistical...thinking is what allowed us to let our guards down for so long and practically invite the attack that came on 9/11. Even though I know we have a FEW home grown terrorists, the bottom line is that our open borders have made it very easy for terrorists to infiltrate into our society.

Answer 4

Actually no.... If anyone believes that we can ever be safe by sticking our head in the sand and denying this religious war is a fool... That we've been successful thus far is only because most of the effort of the enemy has been focused in defeating us in Iraq. And the fools that claim that us being over there is a recruiting tool for the terrorist so we should come home.... If that were the case our defeat would be a far greater recruiting tool.... FAR GREATER.... The only way to defeat the terrorist is to totally exterminate them... that will take decades of commitment... It can't be done like a 3 day mini series on TV

Answer 5

9/11 was an inside job people.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003
http://veritas.20m.com/

You're NEVER going to see any controversial info about 9/11 on our corporate owned, heavily censored news channels. Just watch the video I link to- take notice how when the engineering Professor starts talking about how the towers wouldn't have collapsed from the planes, they almost immediately shut him up and cut him off. Free Country my ***. Also look up how the "9/11 commission" has changed their official report countless times, to try and fit the "official story". The most powerful country in the world can't investigate a "terrorist attack" and come to a solid conclusion about what happened?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
The whole point of 9/11 was to jump start the publics hatred of Arab people.
This gets us rallied behind Bush to invade Iraq and Afghanistan.
No weapons of MD found, but our country now hates the Arab world over the fake 9/11.
We take oil, oil, oil, .....

Also, look into Saddam and the world oil market. The US has a monopoly of sorts, in that the oil market uses the US Dollar. Every country has to stockpile massive amounts of US Dollars to buy oil with. This keeps the dollar somewhat stable. Saddam wanted to break free of this and sell Iraqi oil to China and Russia using the much stronger Euro as oil transaction currency. This would be bad for the US Dollar, as you can bet other countries would have followed. Depression anyone? Maybe...

Open your eyes people, the global economy is complex and we are not the "good guys"...there are no "good guys".

Answer 6

Absolutely...This is primarily a fear tactic that has been used in the recent as well as distant past in an attempt to create a national unifying front in support of the government. It's not that hard to keep them out if you think about it but the problem is magnified because of conservative propaganda. They used the same rhetoric during the Vietnam debacle. The REALLY SCARY part is they may ALLOW an attack to achieve their agenda.

Answer 7

Fighting Islamic fascism in Iraq is a big part of keeping America safe. If you surrender there no place will be safe from the Islamic fury that will be unleashed. They attack when they perceive weakness, and back off at a show of strength.

Answer 8

Wonder what they will say when we get attacked again and we are still stuck in Iraq. Sure they will come up with something to blame the democrats.

Answer 9

It isn't Bush we are worried about, he only has a year left. It is one of those weak socialist ostriches that you call candidates that we are worried about. Your man Obama says he will negotiate with anyone and invade Pakistan. Hilary was fooled by Bush, if she can't even deal with a man you consider an idiot then how can she possibly deal with the smart leaders of other countries?

Answer 10

no their not, its more controlable over in iraq we'd have to fight a war here and that would be putting way more americans in trouble then ever planned, its just safer and we can avoid accidents like 911 when terrorist come on to our turf. >:[
its sad a 15 year old can answer this question.. and you cant

Answer 11

Are you going to be quiet and leave us alone if we leave Iraq then get attacked again at home and after that attack turn the Middle East into a sheet of glass?

Of course your not.