English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-04 01:00:47 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

ndgbill- if you don't even own a car you probably ain't even paying your share...

2007-08-04 01:43:12 · update #1

17 answers

The bigger problem is that the Democrat Party is defining "kids" as 25 and under and eligibility up to $82,000 yearly income..... But we can't deny the "children" now can we?

edit:
And to pay for it they will reduce Medicare already in place for the elderly...

2007-08-04 01:53:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We need to start handing out more birth control.
Should there be a limit on how many kids?
Whose fault is it the guys or the girls?
But yes I am fed up with that to.
I can't afford my health insurance. Seems that I work for a week just for my health insurance. Still can't make ends meet.

2007-08-04 08:20:36 · answer #2 · answered by LA LA 6 · 1 0

The cost of healthcare for a child isn't that great. Most of the cost is during the first year of life. After that, the healthcare cost is nominal.
It's much more costly for healthcare of the elderly. Old age last a long time and has lengthy illnesses.
Children don't ask to be born. If a child is born to a family that can't afford it, it's not that child's fault. You would be in favor of letting a child die from lack of healthcare because their parents are irresponsible. If you happen to be at the scene of an accident, would you let the victim of the crash die on the street because he was stupid enough to drive recklessly?
Children are innocent victims of their parent's lifestyle. They are no different then any other person who is in dire trouble thru no fault of their own. Do you wish to stop rescuing all victims faced with life threatening problems?

2007-08-04 08:17:14 · answer #3 · answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4 · 1 3

Because we are a nation of people who honestly believe that we should be allowed to do whatever we want, whenever we want, without consideration for the consiquences. We are a nation of people who complain about the rising costs of health care and gasoline while listening to our $250 Ipods, talking on our $500 Iphones, listing to over $500 in Itunes, walking in $250 shoes, and driving $70,000 SUVs that get 17 mpg! We are a nation of people who put everything on credit but then complain about the monthly payments, we are a nation of people who stuff our faces with fast food then blame the restaurant for causing us to gain weight! And we are a nation that thinks having kids out of wedlock and forcing the tax payers to fit the bill is how things should be!

2007-08-04 08:08:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 3 2

Seems simple to me as well. If you can't afford to keep them don't have them. But oh no, have to have them left and right, then they just need thousands in video games but oopsss can't afford to pay for the health care so federal government gimme gimme gimme. Responsibility starts at home.

2007-08-04 08:30:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Good question, for some reason people think cashing in on children is justifiable, just because they are children, this really pisses me off. Our present society thinks it is OK to slack off because local government laws have been adjusted to take money from the working class and give it to those " less fortunate", meaning mostly lazy and unreliable. I really do not mind helping those in need but only when they really do not have any other options. Not using protection and popping out kids left and right even though you cannot pay for then is just plain stupid.

2007-08-04 08:08:34 · answer #6 · answered by tuckerjess 2 · 6 3

Police protection,education (to high school level),water supply and a number of other items are deemed to be BASIC HUMAN NECESSITIES and as such is provided by governments (usually) out of tax revenues.

If HEATH CARE is NOT a BASIC HUMAN NECESSITY then I do not know what the hell is !!!

Having no children ,why the hell should I pay to educate children INCLUDING YOURS NO DOUBT .

I do not drive a car so why should I pay for the public related costs.

This list goes on.

I do not drive a car so why should I pay for

2007-08-04 08:23:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Why does anyone have kids? 'Cause that's how life works. I pay for everyone's kids' healthcare on the NHS and I'm not complaining because I think that children deserve healthcare - they didn't ask to be born to a poor family, there's nothing they can do about it, so why punish children for their parents' financial mistakes?

2007-08-04 08:04:59 · answer #8 · answered by Berkshire Bella 3 · 6 3

They are socialists.

Kids Care is Welfare.

So is socialist VA health care.

Veterans are citizens, not in the military anymore. They can get a J O B to pay for THEIR health care.

2007-08-04 08:04:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

If people stopped having kids there would be no one to support you when you get old. It all comes back around.

2007-08-04 08:13:01 · answer #10 · answered by Kicking 3 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers