why he is allowed to bowl when his arms are deformed and he is getting benefits from it,as blinds r not allowed to drive so he should not be allowed to bowl.!!
your views on this.
2007-08-04 00:25:08 · 21 answers · asked by ultimatechamp_1 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
No Mr. most the bowlers have been doing this since international cricket started.
when murali start to take buckets of wickets,some "j"
people became green monsters.
specially australian green Monsters,
if his arms are deformed it is not his fault.
do you think every defrmed guy can magically bowl like
Murali?
i guess you are an As*-tralian....aren't you?
2007-08-04 06:16:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Razzak bends his arm over 10 levels extra beneficial than the two Kirtley, or Murali. He has no longer been banned, he's been suspended, as have been the two the different bowlers suggested. James Kirtley spent a iciness re-correcting his action, and then had it checked by using the ICC bio-mechanic professionals, and replaced into allowed to bowl returned. the comparable with Murali. Marlon Samuels from the WI has in basic terms had the comparable situation take place to him, as his speedier off-spinner is a blatant chuck. he's presently re-modelling his action, and can't bowl till he has shown that he falls interior ICC regulations.
2016-12-11 09:53:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the ICC is more clever and knows the rules much better than us? NO?like even they could not prove Murali wrong after so many attempts ..how can someone call his action illegal? a person who took above 700 wickets is definitely a great player and he is needed to stay in the cricket world..he is a legend and i think a great miracle for circket ! his action is different but not illegal !
2007-08-05 08:20:00 · answer #3 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Muralitharan was reported for suspected bowling action on couple of occasions and he has been cleared all the time.
Since his bowling does not violate the laid down parameters, it will be unfair to question his bowling action after he has played cricket so long and is in the verge of creating record for most number of wickets.
2007-08-04 04:17:15 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If a white man chucks, he is still a great bowler! If a darkie's bowling action is off, and a white cannot play his bowling , he throws. Why do you assume that the white umpire is always right?
2007-08-05 03:19:08 · answer #5 · answered by wind 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You r wrong.Muralitharan is a world class bowler and his way of bowling is not illegal.So he gets benefits by his bowling in legal way
2007-08-07 00:48:19 · answer #6 · answered by MJR 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the bowling aciton satisfies 15 degree rule which most of the bowlers do for doosra and all bowler throw the ball if u notice their action all r just throws especially fast bowlers like shohieb akhthar and lasith malinga
2007-08-04 18:39:11 · answer #7 · answered by rejin s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No .. hes allowed by bowling
2007-08-05 17:41:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think ur still in the year 2000,
The whole world came to know that the ICC has decided his bowling action is legal...
2007-08-04 04:17:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well the ICC have taken Muralidaran under suspection a couple of times but they have cleared him both the times and now he is on the verge of creating a record in both the test he has already created and in ODI's he is just going to make it to the record books
2007-08-04 23:29:21 · answer #10 · answered by RISHI 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋