after all they only have 3% approval rating...
2007-08-04 00:22:36 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Or as low as 2%...
2007-08-04 00:34:24 · update #1
Plus or minus 1%. It could be as high as 4%.
2007-08-04 00:26:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Think of how much money we as tax payers would save in upkeep, security, and utilities. Good question. Why can't our Government function out of a strip mall instead of old buildings that have cathedral ceilings and waste more energy and money than Bush himself?
2007-08-04 00:34:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes it would be a bad thing.
2007-08-04 00:31:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is always a shame to lose beautiful architecture for the sake of getting at the people inside, or for ridiculous senses of purpose (ie. religion, of all things!)...however, in the case of GW & his Administrative wonders...I'd say Go for it!!! LOL
Seriously...terrorists revel in media attention & we give them every bit of that, don't we? I prefer the bow & arrow to the gun method...gets the job done, little other destruction, shows greater skill, effort, & sense of purpose...quieter, too.
2007-08-04 00:49:47 · answer #4 · answered by MsET 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Not if Bush and Cheney were both there at the time.
2007-08-04 04:03:39 · answer #5 · answered by EMAILSKIP 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would be a shame to destroy such a beautiful building.
2007-08-04 00:28:16 · answer #6 · answered by hironymus 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You're certainly a great American. Thx for the points...K ;o)
2007-08-04 00:30:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it would be really bad.
2007-08-04 00:28:45 · answer #8 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
of course, that's a bad thing.
2007-08-04 00:30:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It would. But thanks for the points.
2007-08-04 00:24:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋