Elaboration:
This question follows along with the "What is real?" line of questioning. Suppose you had a lifelong desire to touch the Sphinx, for instance. If you could visit a "virtual Sphinx" and the experience were as exactly as vivid as it would be if you were actually there, would that be enough or would you still want to touch the "real deal"?
Insert any experience you may actually desire into your answer - if you could have identical experiences either in the real world, or in a virtual copy of the real world, would your knowledge that it's not "real" make you continue to seek it out in the "real world"? If it depends on what the subject matter is, are there things you'd settle for experiencing entirely in VR and only in VR versus things that you would only feel fulfilled in experiencing "for real"?
Please, be as detailed and elaborative as you wish. I'm very interested in your answers to this question. :-)
2007-08-03
23:21:14
·
4 answers
·
asked by
uncleclover
5
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology
Just to clarify: Yes, I know we don't have anything approaching "Matrix-like" VR, but for the purpose of this question, I'm asking you to pretend that we do. That the VR experience is the same as far as your senses are concerned - and that would be all 5 senses (or more, if you're aware of any) and the only difference would be in what you _know_ about the experienced reality - the experience itself would be exactly the same.
2007-08-04
03:24:59 ·
update #1