Pound for pound who is the best QB for the Chicago bears?
2007-08-03 22:55:23 · 10 answers · asked by annasdad 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I would say Grossman only because if you think on it, last season was his first true FULL season, and while it was filled with ups and downs, he did do an overall okay job.
I think he's learned from last year, and from what I've seen coming out of camp Rex has improved and looks good. At least he has the experience, good or bad, needed to start at QB. Do you really want to go back to square one with someone that doesn't have that experience at all?
2007-08-04 02:37:16 · answer #1 · answered by icequeen_ah 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Haha, do a google search for Kyle Orton. The first image results that pop up are him drunk stumbling with a bottle of Jack Daniels.
Rex Grossman? This is like saying whats better a D on a test or an F. I'd rather not get a D or an F. I'd rather not have either QB. Lets just say Rex Grossman cause he has more starting experience and Kyle Orton didn't really wow anyone except like a few games at Purdue.
2007-08-04 02:54:59 · answer #2 · answered by Mike Ditka! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither of them are really consistent but i would have to choose rex grossman. he has his ups and downs and on his first full season as a starter he led the bears to a superbowl and a very good record. i would start grossman and let him get more of a feel. also he is improving his foot work in training camp which should help him out. kyle orton is a fumble magician and his stats are 368 attempts 190 completions 51.6 percent completion 1869 yards 5.08 yeard average 54 yards as long 9 touchdowns 13 intercepions and a quarter back rating of 59.7... rex grossmans stats are 675 attempts 367 completions 54 percent completion 4496 yards average yeards are 6.6 long of 62 27 touchdowns and 26 interceptions and a quarterback rating of 72.4. so comparing the stats rex grossman should be the starter.
2007-08-04 01:47:31 · answer #3 · answered by Native of Plainfield, NH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Rex will learn a bit faster than Orton, but I think that with some grooming both could eventually be solid starters in this league. Orton is a few years behind Rex, but as long as Rex stays healthy and the Bears can put talent around Orton, both are serviceable at worst.
2007-08-04 03:30:04 · answer #4 · answered by Dan in Real Life 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats like asking me to %. between a butt whooping or a kick interior the face. yet i could pass with Grossman. the subject with him is the comparable situation that makes him super(his arm)is the comparable situation that gets him into worry. He has to income extra action picture and learn dispositions till now he even thinks approximately taking the subsequent step. Orton is a shaggy dog tale guy.
2016-12-11 09:52:23 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Griese is the best QB.
Orton sucks.
Grossman proved over and over again he is a disaster in big games.
Griese has plenty of experience as a starting QB in the NFL, and deserves to be on the field.
2007-08-04 04:10:55 · answer #6 · answered by Mr R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Grossman, they don't seem to give Orton a chance.
2007-08-04 07:30:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
im not your regular bears fan only because im gonna say Rex Grossman on this one.
2007-08-04 01:02:39 · answer #8 · answered by Shaq Diesel 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both suck, but I heard Orton finally sobered up, so he may be better than he was. I haven't heard anything about Griese sobering up, he might still be drunk.
2007-08-04 07:06:38 · answer #9 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is Jim McMahon still around?
2007-08-04 00:34:33 · answer #10 · answered by C-BASS 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋