brian urlacher does live up to his hype because he is one of the elite linebackers in the league. he is probably the second best linebacker in the league behind ray lewis. when you look at his stats he has been very consistent and good...his stats are...Defensive Stats
Year Team G Total Tkl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def
2000 Chicago Bears 16 124 98.0 26 8 2 19 9.5 19 0 3
2001 Chicago Bears 16 116 89.0 27 6 3 60 20.0 41 0 5
2002 Chicago Bears 16 151 115.0 36 4.5 1 0 0.0 0 0 6
2003 Chicago Bears 16 116 87.0 29 2.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 4
2004 Chicago Bears 9 70 52.0 18 5.5 1 42 42.0 42 0 6
2005 Chicago Bears 16 121 97.0 24 6 0 0 0.0 0 0 5
2006 Chicago Bears 16 141 92.0 49 0 3 38 12.7 36 0 6
TOTAL 105 839 630.0 209 32.5 10 159 15.9 42 0 35
Receiving
Year Team G GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ 1st
2000 Chicago Bears 16 14 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0
2001 Chicago Bears 16 16 1 27 27.0 27 1 1 0 1
2002 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0
2003 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0
2004 Chicago Bears 9 9 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0
2005 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0
2006 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 105 103 1 27 27.0 27 1 1 0 1
Passing
Year Team G GS Att Comp Pct Yds YPA Lg TD Int Tkld 20+ 40+ Rate
2000 Chicago Bears 16 14 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---
2001 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---
2002 Chicago Bears 16 16 1 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 39.6
2003 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---
2004 Chicago Bears 9 9 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---
2005 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---
2006 Chicago Bears 16 16 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---
TOTAL 105 103 1 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 39.6
Fumbles
Year Team G Fum Lost Fum Forced Own Rec Opp Rec Yds Tot Rec TD
2000 Chicago Bears 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
2001 Chicago Bears 16 0 0 2 0 2 101 2 1
2002 Chicago Bears 16 0 0 2 0 2 43 2 0
2003 Chicago Bears 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2004 Chicago Bears 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
2005 Chicago Bears 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2006 Chicago Bears 16 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
TOTAL 105 0 0 8 0 6 144 6 1 ...it may be hard to read so you may want to look at the clearer stats on http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/187400. urlacher is living up to his hype.
2007-08-04 01:52:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Native of Plainfield, NH 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Brian Urlacher is all he is cracked up to be. He has turned multiple "quality" linebackers into "superstars". There is a reason why Roosevelt Colvin and Lance Briggs weren't as heavily sought after as there stats would lead you to think they would be. They are a product of the abilities of Brian Urlacher. He is a leader. He leads one of the greatest defenses in NFL, and produces major individual stats every year. Hard to argue with facts.
2007-08-03 23:12:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by micky630 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He probably gets too much media hype but he is one of the best linebackers in the business. What puts him a notch above most others is not only his ability to stop the run but to drop back in pass coverage. He ends up all over the field of play and is quite versatile.
2007-08-04 05:46:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zinger 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's a media day parade because he's so good. He's clearly one of the top five linebackers in the NFL today, and one of the main reasons why the Bears defense is so fierce.
2007-08-03 23:06:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Secret Asian Man 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's one of the best MLBs in the league, but the media talks about him wayyyy too much. It's not like he's by far the best LB in the league or anything, but the media talks about him 1000 times more than they talk about any other LB. He's a great LB, but he still gets more credit than he deserves. There are other great LBs out there; let's hear about them!
2007-08-04 02:39:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sometimes he lives up to his hype, but that is usually against the weak teams in the Bears' division.
2007-08-04 02:09:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hoss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is the one of the best linebackers of all-time he had an injury last season so he missed a few games.
2007-08-04 02:27:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a Dick Butkus or a Ray Nitchke but very good.
2007-08-04 05:00:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tommy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was not as spectacular this year as in years past. This qualifies him as an awesome player.
2007-08-04 01:34:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by berries and creme lad 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is another media slug.
2007-08-04 01:22:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Michael M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋