2007-08-03 20:11:17 · 14 answers · asked by Ethan M 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Apparently not, because you're still sane enough to want to protect the constitution.
2007-08-03 20:14:08 · answer #1 · answered by Giliathriel 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I have read a few of your posts my brother and I think you are certainly not a wingnut. The first two issues I hold very near and dear. The third I feel impacts the first greatly and is a miserable, gut-wrenching topic that really challenges the role of society and the individual. If you are prepared to legislate this I feel you also have an obligation to further the existence of that innocent child that is brought into this world. And guess what that involves...compounding government intervention. Life is not fair but if I tell a mother (and father if applicable) that they will have a child I also need to ensure that child is provided for…the parents already have showed their shortcomings with responsibility and/or planning. I don’t advocate late term abortions (nor infanticide for that matter). I also feel that legislating morality is a slippery slope. I am hesitant to think that I should, in a family/home where a baby is already unwanted, feel that the danger to the infant stops upon the birth and that then all is well. Small government places a large measure of responsibility with the general populace…I have faith in the majority of my fellow citizens. So...nope not a wingnut just internally challenged on a topic that has torn at virtually everyone.
2007-08-04 03:13:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
by using definition a team of cells (the 1st tri-mester, the place the vast majority of abortions ensue), which could no longer experience soreness, isn't somewhat one. a woman, or a pair in many situations, who made a gigantic mistake (maximum women folk human beings don't have to any extent further than one abortion), pressured to place her physique by using the actual and emotional lines of exertions till now she is waiting, now which could wreck a life.. however this is not constantly a mistake: start-administration fails, women human beings are raped, could desire to we set up a court docket to decide if a woman has a good sufficient reason to make the very annoying determination to have an abortion? persuade a panel of jurors? the subject i discover humorous is that those against abortion are in many situations against sexual training. incredibly a humorous relationship there. We do, in spite of the shown fact that, have lots of our toddlers growing to be up in under poverty point, frequently abusive circumstances, raised by using human beings could desire to have never been allowed to have toddlers. unusual how we don't see extra efforts going into assisting those toddlers. do no longer worry approximately those toddlers gotta provide that 10% to the church.
2016-12-11 09:50:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you believe a a zygote, an embryo, a fetus is a person and support tax breaks for the wealthy then yes you qualify!
A zygote, an embryo, a fetus is neither a baby nor is it a sentient being
Main Entry: zy·gote
Pronunciation: 'zI-"gOt
Function: noun
Etymology: Greek zygOtos yoked, from zygoun to join -- more at ZYGOMA
: a cell formed by the union of two gametes; broadly : the developing individual produced from such a cell
- zy·got·ic /zI-'gä-tik/ adjective
Main Entry: em·bryo
Pronunciation: 'em-brE-"O
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural em·bry·os
Etymology: Medieval Latin embryon-, embryo, from Greek embryon, from en- + bryein to swell; akin to Greek bryon catkin
1 a archaic : a vertebrate at any stage of development prior to birth or hatching b : an animal in the early stages of growth and differentiation that are characterized by cleavage, the laying down of fundamental tissues, and the formation of primitive organs and organ systems; especially : the developing human individual from the time of implantation to the end of the eighth week after conception
2 : the young sporophyte of a seed plant usually comprising a rudimentary plant with plumule, radicle, and cotyledons
3 a : something as yet undeveloped b : a beginning or undeveloped state of something
Main Entry: fe·tus
Pronunciation: 'fE-t&s
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin, act of bearing young, offspring; akin to Latin fetus newly delivered, fruitful -- more at FEMININE
: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind; specifically : a developing human from usually three months after conception to birth
Main Entry: sen·tient
Pronunciation: 'sen(t)-sh(E-)&nt, 'sen-tE-&nt
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin sentient-, sentiens, present participle of sentire to perceive, feel
1 : responsive to or conscious of sense impressions
2 : AWARE
3 : finely sensitive in perception or feeling
- sen·tient·ly adverb
2007-08-03 20:20:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Nope, you are just a person who with an opinion.
2007-08-03 21:51:55 · answer #5 · answered by angelpuppyeyes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. You're sane.
2007-08-03 20:38:16 · answer #6 · answered by Jadis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, you're a person with beliefs and ideas like the rest of us.
2007-08-03 20:15:22 · answer #7 · answered by Dull Jon 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
no, your an American who has compassion for unborn baby's. I'm the same way. welcome to the club.
2007-08-03 20:42:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the govt shouldn't go around killing unborn babies fo sure.
2007-08-03 20:24:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
no, many logical people feel this way. its the people who think gov't should be all up in our lives that you have to worry about.
2007-08-03 20:17:25 · answer #10 · answered by Superior Intelligence 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋