some stations do, check the tv guide
2007-08-03 19:54:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by LT 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Most religions have broadcasts on Sunday just not Catholic Mass. Here in LA we have two broadcasts of Catholic Mass. Then there are other religious Christian programs throughout Sunday morning as well.
The United States represent freedom of religion. We all get to choose what we watch and if Catholic Mass is what we want we certainly can watch it. We don;t endorse any religion therefore we show no favoritism for one type of religious service versus another. That is why Ecumenical services are broadcast along with Mass.
Many people who cannot get to church truly rely on this.
Then late on Saturday night/early Sunday Morning, they broadcast Catholic Mass from the Vatican with the Pope celebrating Mass......live.
ABC, CBS, NBC all participate in various religious broadcasts as do many of the other networks. I don't know where you live but here we have it here. Consult your local listings and call your cable provider.
If you do not already have cable, then you should inquire as it is readily available through ours here in Los Angeles and I know that other cities and states have the same thing available. Some even have purely religious channels.
2007-08-03 20:17:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Long Beach 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Try asking that question pre-1961. I'm sure the answer would be rather one-sided against the notion.
While not virulently anti-Catholic anymore, I highly doubt the national networks would today broadcast Catholic services at the expense of other denominations. They'd rather stay out of it.
Plus, "Meet the Press" and "This Week" with Tim and George are quasi-churches with devoted followings of their own, no? lol. Can't interrupt /those/ services!
2007-08-03 20:43:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Me 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
1. Some stations do broadcast masses.
2. Your usage of the term national television networks is imprecise. Some nations have state-run TV networks such as, to some extent, PBS in the US. This means it's national. It's also "nation-wide". IMO, no federally-funded media outlets should be allowed to broadcast any religious services if, as in the US, there are laws ensuring the separation of church and state. Other countries have different rules and mores, so I guess it's up to them to decide. However, as an atheist, I must say that it would be unfortunate if other countries started using federally-funded media outlets to promote one religion--even the state religion--over another.
2007-08-03 20:01:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by k 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
In different countries in addition they stone human beings. do not forget approximately the countries that have lady circumcision. Then there are the countries that don't have national electricity. we could be like them, too. different countries do not rejoice Thanksgiving. different countries do not sparkling their faucet water, so that's not secure to drink...wow that could shop distinctive money if we stopped making our water secure to drink. simply by fact which you extra Phillipines and Portugal as examples of Christian countries...did you comprehend they're racist and have rampant killings regarding those that don't believe the government standpoint? could we be like them in that way, too?? Come on..you get carry of the ball rolling. to those who think of that this united states became shaped on Christian values on my own is blind to why the pilgrims got here acroos the Atlantic Ocean. are you able to assert FREEDOM of religion??? If we initiate up favoring one faith, we so pull faraway from that. If we've been to kowtow and initiate up broadcasting Mass on Sundays on public get admission to television. those best networks could in no way broadcast dramas, comedies, information, and so on.. simply by having to broadcast centers for all denominations. non secular denominations have their own channels already. have you ever considered the tutor seven hundred club? in my view i don't think of the word God could disappear from our Pledge of Allegiance nor our dollar invoice. we've become over excited in recent times changing stuff with the country being 231 yrs previous. next somebody will say the crimson in our flag is offensive. yet lower back to the subject remember to hand..enable me end with 2 words US shape We the folk of the U. S., as a manner to form an more advantageous union, set up justice, insure relatives tranquility, grant for the consumer-friendly protection, sell the final welfare, and maintain the reward of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and set up this shape for the u . s . a .. substitute I Congress shall make no regulation respecting a company of religion, or prohibiting the unfastened exercising thereof; or abridging the liberty of speech, or of the click; or the incredible of the folk peaceably to hold at the same time, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
2016-11-11 04:39:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
why not
I am 50 and as a kid this was a regular feature on TV in the 1960s and 70s.
2007-08-04 02:22:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael M 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think it would be a good idea due to freedom of religion in this country. That sounds more appropriate for a religious network.
2007-08-03 19:56:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by angelicface_70 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
But we have like bunch of 24hr religious channels.
2007-08-03 20:16:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I doubt there are enough Roman Catholics in the USA that would be interested in watching them to tempt advertisers to sponsor it.
2007-08-03 20:20:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Caninelegion 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
why give that
CULT
any more PR?
2007-08-03 20:15:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋