The "Intel Core 2 duo" OR "AMD Anthlon 64 X2
2007-08-03 18:48:28 · 6 answers · asked by stale donut 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Add-ons
Core2 Duo is faster. In benchmarks below, the 3.0Ghz X2 6000+ just had somewhat comparable performance as C2 Duo E6700 (2.66Ghz). Intel's E6850 (3.0Ghz) at 65 watts would easily beat X2 6000+ which draws as much as 125 watts.
http://www.techreport.com/reviews//2007q1/athlon64-x2-6000/index.x?pg=4
2007-08-04 03:16:56 · answer #1 · answered by Karz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The intel core 2 duo is faster. That is depending on which AMD your looking at. If your looking at the top AMD processor its a pretty close comparison. Not to mention much cheaper. And as the other person said, clock speeds (ghz) means nothing anymore.
2007-08-03 19:01:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definetly go with the Intel Core 2 Duo, mainly because it's a quad core processor.
2007-08-03 19:08:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
may be i should explain to you that clock speeds on processors matter no more .and on efficiency front intel core 2 duo tops amd chips and also in power consumption and keepin itself cool ,as of now intel rules the processor area ,which will continue for another 2 years when amd finds a way to introduce better chips than what intel proposes.
2007-08-03 18:54:27 · answer #4 · answered by Alan f 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think core 2 duo is faster.
Ig you want a better one than that go for core 2 extreme..!
2007-08-03 18:56:28 · answer #5 · answered by jn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The majority of C2D chips are faster than their AMD counterparts.
2007-08-03 18:51:05 · answer #6 · answered by Hiroshi Y 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋