2007-08-03 18:46:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
From what can be gathered from the media reports, Vick did nothing to Pitbulls. What he did was rent a house to relatives that allegedly ran a dog fighting operation. If this is true and there is enough evidence, then the assigned court process will find him guilty of aiding and abetting in a felony. The people that allegedly DID something to Pitbulls are his relatives. Why nobody aims their venom at them is hard for me to understand and I can only conclude that it is jealously over someone getting rich playing a kids' game. Vick and his relatives will be tried by a jury of their peers and if convicted, they will be dealt with. Due to the publicity, most likely severely.
2007-08-03 20:51:22 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, I assume you mean "all pets" when you typed "allpets." If this is the case, the majority of pets would do little damage.
Second, why don't you wait until he's convicted before you suggest he be attacked by allpets.
Third, you should consider using punctuation. Someone with a poor grasp of the English language may have read: If you heard what Michael Vick did. To pitbulls, tell me how you feel. I think he should get attacked by allpets." This sentence would, of course, be asking someone to answer your question not directly but through a canine medium.
Love you, bye.
2007-08-04 01:57:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No worry, PETA and other animal rights group will make his life living hell for next 1000 years.
2007-08-04 02:33:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should hang this guy - after they pour battery acid on him after cutting him with a knife - then poke and prod him with electrical wire until he is fried...then eat and shiiittt him out. Then he can go straght to Hell for what he has done. Everyone KNOWS he did it....they just hide it because of who he is...............he will pay for what hes done one way or another.
2007-08-04 03:13:46 · answer #4 · answered by irish_jimmy 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i agree. i am vegan and an animal lover (you would probably have to be to be vegan) and i think he should be stuck in prison wiht no hope of paroll
2007-08-04 02:03:28 · answer #5 · answered by Nick_J_is_off_da_chain 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
''IF'' HE DID WHAT THEY ACCUSE HIM OF, HE SHOULD BE PUNISHED ACCORDINGLY............
2007-08-04 10:53:04 · answer #6 · answered by NATIVE NEW YORKER 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋