via CIA warnings that it wasn't valid?
Bush defends decision on Iraqi war
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/07/09/sprj.irq.bush.sotu/index.html
2007-08-03 17:22:26 · 10 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
dez604 (below) Not angry, nor bitter, not little (6'2 200lbs). Merely disgusted with the Bush admin.
Presidents are not kings.
2007-08-03 17:31:44 · update #1
smsmith500 (below) So the US CIA were wrong but the Brits were right? How convenient.
2007-08-03 17:52:23 · update #2
Ask this again on Tuesday. That's the day the President is on Yahoo!
2007-08-03 17:26:36 · answer #1 · answered by Amanda B 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You dont justify it. You just dont talk about it. Thats how our media works. You might want to look at http://www.freedocumentaries.org to see free contraversial films. Here are the categories below
Media Documentaries
War Documentaries
9/11 and London Bombing Documentaries
Domestic Documentaries
Election Fraud Documentaries
Environmental Documentaries
Israel-Palestine Documentaries
Iraq Documentaries
Afghanistan Documentaries
George Bush Documentaries
Latin America Documentaries
Globalization Documentaries
Politician Documentaries
Religious Documentaries
Activist Documentaries
Africa Documentaries
Human Rights Documentaries
Health Documentaries
Animal Abuse Documentaries
2007-08-04 12:00:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The British intelligence stood by the report. And it was confirmed by translations of iraqi documents that Saddam had sent a "trade delegation" to Niger with the express purpose of buying yellow cake Uranium.
2007-08-03 17:35:31 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
humorous question because of the fact this is not the fact in any respect. This solid checklist that replaced into the middle piece of Joe Wilson's fake accusations, replaced into never seen valid by using the administration, nor replaced into it used to justify the attack on Iraq. Wilson's truthfully checklist, which reported a delegation from Iraq had met with the commerce minister of Niger (they weren't searching for pottery), and British intelligence comments the two supported the reality that Saddam had sought to purchase yellowcake. yet neither of those have been based on the glaring forgery you talk of. Who places those stupid lies on your head? some lefty loony internet site?
2016-12-11 09:45:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
BTW I think the proper term is President...you people keep forgetting he beat both your boys in elections...
And, I believe the intel was the best available at the time!!
2007-08-03 17:34:48 · answer #5 · answered by iroteb 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
we just have to come to grips with the fact that Bush is a horrible leader and one of the worst presidents of all time
2007-08-07 04:33:21 · answer #6 · answered by njdevil 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are a angry bitter little man, I am begining to doubt your time servered at Barksdale, HAVE YOU EVER READ AN INTELL REPORT??? IT'S THE BEST POSSIBLE INFORMATION AT THE TIME, CLINTON BOMBED HIM IN 98 WITH THE SAME INFO LOOK IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-08-03 17:29:30 · answer #7 · answered by dez604 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
According to him if the President does it then it must be okay because he's the president.
2007-08-03 17:26:12 · answer #8 · answered by ash 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
still peddling that lie?
how 2003....
2007-08-03 17:27:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
does your mother know you are up?
2007-08-03 17:27:06 · answer #10 · answered by billnzan 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋