We hear the Democrats complain daily about President Bush, buy yet they keep electing pond scum like John Kerry and Ted Kennedy. How come you don’t complain about these 2 characters? No instead, you put Kerry on the pedestal and tried to elect him President. Proves the irrational thought process of most democrats.
2007-08-03 16:37:56 · 12 answers · asked by wishiwas 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey priorityze_ur_lyf,
I seem to recall Kerry lieing through his teeth about his vote for the war (you know the war he DID vote for).
2007-08-03 16:47:05 · update #1
Check!!
Right on the money!!!
2007-08-03 16:43:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush is president and deserves to be scrutinized as the leader, he is responsible for much of the direction this country takes...the president, any president, is not a king and is no more above the laws and standards of any other citizen...he was elected by us and needs to serve the interests of Americans...if a person thinks the standing president is not doing so, it is his duty as a citizen to use his freedoms of speech to make his point known... Neither Kerry or Kennedy have the position of power that Bush has
2007-08-03 16:52:57 · answer #2 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I haven't kept electing Kerry or Kennedy for anything.
I have never put Kerry on a pedestal, nor did I ever vote for him.
Does that mean I can continue complaining about that rabid, nasty, lying Bush?
2007-08-03 16:47:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because neither Kerry nor Kennedy is the commander-in-chief that failed to stop the attack on 9-11, and they're not the ones that has badly messed up this country the way Bush did.
2007-08-03 16:44:25 · answer #4 · answered by MrEntrepreneur 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Kerry made that bad comment AFTER losing the election, not before it, but at least Kerry CAN BE A MAN AND ADMIT MISTAKES.
"Dumbaya" and his administration continue to make stupid moves and mistakes, and don't care.
Remember the definition of insanity: Repeating the same thing over and over and expecting a different result...
EDIT: Then he was WRONG. See how easy it is to state someone is WRONG. Now try it with the republican party, because it has been WRONG for the last 7 YEARS...
2007-08-03 16:43:37 · answer #5 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You are actually the irrational thinker in this stuation...why would Democrats complain about their own candidate? That makes no sense. Second, Bush is president therefore he can make large mistakes that can actually effect our country. Kerry and Kennedy cannot actually make desicions that can make or break this country. Do you understand now?
2007-08-03 16:44:15 · answer #6 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because Kerry and Kennedy aren't wrong EVERY time like Bush is.
Also, they haven't killed 3,700 of our soldiers and wasted $500 billion on a phony war against a country that was never a threat to us.
2007-08-03 16:45:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think some liberals have complained. Like many liberals still nag Hillary about her war vote record. What the hell do you mean by 'you'? It's just so easy to win a debate when you generalize EVERYTHING. Isn't it?
2007-08-03 16:52:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because I haven't seen any of them repeatedly violate federal laws, publicly admit doing so, and then claim executive immunity to prosecution by saying they are above the law.
When I see someone else doing that, I will oppose them too. Their political party is completely irrelevant.
2007-08-03 16:41:46 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Answer:
$$$
2007-08-03 16:42:26 · answer #10 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋