2007-08-03 15:22:31 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No why would it? That's silly. If anything it would prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place. I knew a young woman who didn't have access to birth control, thus got pregnant and then decided to have an abortion. If she had easier access to birth control, she would have used it.
2007-08-03 15:25:53 · answer #1 · answered by tarro 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I examine plenty. for the time of faculty, I examine for the time of despite unfastened time I unquestionably have. that includes stroll around time, lunch, in between instructions, and when I end my homework for a type. At abode, i do no longer somewhat examine that many books, in general basically fanfiction. yet I positioned a minimum of a competent hour into it throughout the night. I frequently examine myth books. Sci fi each each from time to time.
2016-10-01 08:56:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That doesn't make sense. Why would a woman choose to have an abortion for any other reason than she needed to. Like any medical procedure there is a risk.
*
2007-08-03 15:26:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
HUH?!?!?
Are you kidding?!?!? It wouldn't matter. Besides, the Government can make it so it doesn't pay for abortions. SO NO, IT WOULD NOT...
2007-08-03 15:28:03 · answer #4 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, decrease it.
Because it doesn't pay for elective medical procedures, but it provide for preventative care -- including preventing pregnancy in the first place.
At least, that's why most drafts read -- until it is passed, it is subject to change.
2007-08-03 15:26:03 · answer #5 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
well if women start having sex with you theres a definite possibility
juuuust kidding
2007-08-03 15:26:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋