English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Not true. Republicans are not born greedy. Greedy people become Republicans. And they can sometimes change before you poke them with a stick. They just need to think that a change will make them richer, even if it won't.

2007-08-03 13:38:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Communism has not work. Just look at the Soviet Union. Wait, it is not there any more. Democracy is alive and well over there. I still do not get why I should give my hard earned money to the government that cannot spend the money wisely. Earmarks are from both sides, you cannot say just these"greedy" republicans are doing it.

As a truth seeker, you sure are not that truthful. You need to take off those rose colored glasses, this country would be better off with the politicians as statesmans and not little kids.

2007-08-03 20:58:07 · answer #2 · answered by Mark C 3 · 1 1

Because LIBELrals just want to preach to them how much better off they'd be with less money, and how they don't deserve the filthy riches they earn for themselves ( but look how well the Libels live, drive SUV's and preach about Global warming, preach about Gun control, yet have their own private hand guns)
- The Gremlin Guy -

2007-08-03 20:49:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

By "share" are you referring to "redistribution of wealth"? That's communism, friend. I'd like to see more able bodied people getting jobs, myself. Most of the... "social engineering" that our government has taken upon itself as a responsibility since 1933 steps *way* outside the bounds of our FEDERAL (not "National") government's constitutional obligations.

2007-08-03 20:37:25 · answer #4 · answered by trentrockport 5 · 4 1

If you were to do honest research you would find that more conservative people are the ones who donate the most money and time to charity- the ones that actually help people not million dollar contributions to get a new building at Yale named after them.

2007-08-03 20:46:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Sharing is done at the discretion and on the terms of the person who has something to share. It's done out of charity and kindness, not because you are entitled to what they have.

2007-08-03 20:58:59 · answer #6 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 2 1

Look I am not a fan of the Republican party but I think namecalling and bashing is shameful from anyone. Can you argue your point without the hate?

2007-08-03 20:37:48 · answer #7 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 3 1

Way to coin a phrase there Einstein. YOU & those LIKE YOU are the very reason this country has no ethical moral fabric left. You remind me of an idiot I once met in Tibet, but he had a physical affliction.

2007-08-03 20:40:37 · answer #8 · answered by Job1000 4 · 5 3

It's not called "sharing" if you are forced to do it. And paying higher taxes isn't sharing - it's being forced to give up what you worked hard for to give it to someone who refuses to work hard.
You don't really want the truth do you?

2007-08-03 20:39:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Using a stick is how they got the money in the first place.

2007-08-03 20:37:30 · answer #10 · answered by suigeneris-impetus 6 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers