English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Personally I Think we could actually get stuff done.

Govt. Spending would be cut by 2/3rds

Unfortunately Weed would be legalized, (Oh god, We'll have to live in a country where people can use a cheap effective harmless medicine)

The war would end.

And basically about 90% of our problems would be solved.

So, what do you think would happen, I want to hear all sides of the argument, what if, somehow a libertarian majority was elected to both the house and the Senate.

PS. Please Don't just give a shout out for Libertarians, I want to hear real answers.

2007-08-03 12:04:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

13 answers

There would be no easy way to get rid of social security but I could easily see huge spending cuts getting through even if it took advanced coordination with the states, so that the states could raise their local taxes to appropriately adjust for the loss of federal grant revenue. The amount of corruption that would be cut out by leaving the majority of taxation to the states alone would spur foreign investment, productivity growth, and probably create an unprecedented economic boom. Budget deficits would be a thing of the past.

I don't know where this rhetoric about anarchy and isolationism comes from. Most libertarians believe in state/local government and free trade in accordance with the principles of the constitution. The modern libertarian is just a 21st century Madisonian - and don't tell me America was an 'isolationist anarchist state' before the Republican-Democrats took over. It just wasn't a world empire with a top-down bureaucracy accused of innumerable wars and human rights abuses.

2007-08-03 12:35:40 · answer #1 · answered by freedom first 5 · 0 0

As a libertarian as quickly as defined to me. they choose for a regulation that bans rules. (Contradiction lots?) Libertarians seem to miss that lobbying is going as a great way back using fact the founding fathers and that they observed it as thoroughly needed for a functioning government! it is authentic that the founders did no longer foresee how great the US might desire to be, how useful companies gets and how lots money human beings could make. yet each and every person everywhere might desire to foyer for the government. if certainty be told, balloting is taken into consideration one of those lobbying! What the libertarians sense is they have been delivered down and suppressed by utilising the guy! Obama even suggested in 2008 that he does no longer use super %. (considered one of those lobbying) yet he did in spite of the undeniable fact that. Ron Paul has a super percentso he can "compete" with the others in the "loose marketplace." Libertarians do no longer seem to care approximately no lobbying whilst they do it too! So, the ban lobbying concern is ridiculous using fact it is thoroughly constitutional besides.

2016-10-09 04:11:27 · answer #2 · answered by goulette 4 · 0 0

You'd think that would be the case, but what would happen is that fraud would become 'normal'. The 'market' would become unglued because nobody could trust their supplier not to cheat. Uninspired government supervision would mean that not only would the buyer have to beware, but so would the seller. Stability would be strictly local and under the direction of some form of mafiosa or warlord. Government spending may be cut by 2/3, but the problems of social and physical infastructure would remain. Even St. Reagan said, "Trust, but verify." Who's going to do the verifying? Who will watch the watchers? I believe the Feregi Empire tried all that...maybe it worked for them, but of course the Frengi are fictional charcters...not 21st century Americans living in a rapidly changing world. I'll have to vote no.

2007-08-03 12:19:19 · answer #3 · answered by Noah H 7 · 0 4

Very little. That is, a lot of the things that are happening now, would stop. Kiss Social Security and the Income Tax goodbye. Similarly, social programs, parks, subsidies, 'corporsate welfare' - b'bye. Expect the budget to balance at about 1/3rd what it is today, with income primarily from tarrifs. Foriegn policy? What foreign policy? Isolationism would rule the day.

The effect of the sudden lack of government would be staggering. Economic collapse wouldn't be too strong a word to use. Outright chaos in the streets wouldn't be out of the question, as tens of millions of former recipients of government largess, and millions of former government employees find themselves with nothing much to do but riot.

It would be quite a mess - but, if America survived for a few years, it'd be a better place than it is today. /If/ it survived...

2007-08-03 12:14:48 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1 6

Believe it or not, I think they would be paralyzed. I don't think they could develop a plan to go from where we are, to where they want us to be, without causing a lot of pain to a great many people.

How do you go about dismantling Social Security that tens of millions of seniors depend on as their primary source of income? Same for Medicare?

When confronted by the reality of the world, I don't think they'd be so anxious to cut defense spending that much either.

I don't believe for a second that gov't spending would decline by 2/3rds.

However even if they just put a stop to future growth of new gov't programs and pork, that would be a substantial success! And yes, they'd legalize weed too.

2007-08-03 12:11:30 · answer #5 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 0 5

I think America would pull together again. I think we would start heading in the right direction. I think the public would support the government more.

2007-08-03 12:11:56 · answer #6 · answered by Keith 4 · 7 2

We would have no operating budget. We would be isolationist. We would have near anarchy. The infrastructure would be worse than it is now. Government spending would be cut because there would be nothing to spend.

Nope! I don't even want that sort of mess. People think things are bad now. Get a libertarian in power and this will look like paradise.

2007-08-03 12:11:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 8

Since libertarians favour free markets and minimal government, a lot of things would be privatized. In keeping with this spirit, it's my suggestion that America contract out its government to a country like India. Imagine this:

"You have reached the White House. President Sanjay is on another line. Press '1' if you need to have a decision made, press '2' if you need technical support for your computer, press '3' if you want to buy an ink jet cartridge, press '4' if you would like Vice President Vijay to shoot someone in the face..."

2007-08-03 12:11:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 9

Well you think things are s l o w up there now, just wait til the pot heads get in. As I remember, back in the day when I did the stuff, I always got slow & paranoid. Cutting govt spending by 2/3 rds ??? I doubt it, they would just end up like the present elitists right now

2007-08-03 12:08:34 · answer #9 · answered by Job1000 4 · 0 7

Government services would be cut, but we would not be taxed as heavily.

Social standards would go left. Economics would go right to the extent that the market would rule all aspects of economic interaction - there would be no FDA to protect us from being sold things that will kill us, let price determine who lives and dies.

Either that, or they would moderate their stance and be no different from Republicans or Democrats.

2007-08-03 12:43:58 · answer #10 · answered by Kal 1 · 0 7

fedest.com, questions and answers